Live media of GNOME 2.30

2010-04-01 Thread Andreas Nilsson
In the GNOME 2.30 release notes there is a link to the 2.30 live images, but upon arrival on http://torrent.gnome.org/ , the only thing you can download is 2.26 live images. Are there any 2.30 live images around, or should we scrap that link in the release notes? - Andreas -- marketing-list ma

Re: Live media of GNOME 2.30

2010-04-01 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 01 avril 2010, à 12:08 +0200, Andreas Nilsson a écrit : > In the GNOME 2.30 release notes there is a link to the 2.30 live > images, but upon arrival on http://torrent.gnome.org/ , the only > thing you can download is 2.26 live images. > Are there any 2.30 live images around, or should we

Re: Live media of GNOME 2.30

2010-04-01 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:17:27PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le jeudi 01 avril 2010, à 12:08 +0200, Andreas Nilsson a écrit : > > In the GNOME 2.30 release notes there is a link to the 2.30 live > > images, but upon arrival on http://torrent.gnome.org/ , the only > > thing you can download is 2

Re: Live media of GNOME 2.30

2010-04-01 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 01 avril 2010, à 12:51 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:17:27PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le jeudi 01 avril 2010, à 12:08 +0200, Andreas Nilsson a écrit : > > > In the GNOME 2.30 release notes there is a link to the 2.30 live > > > images, but upon arrival o

Re: Live media of GNOME 2.30

2010-04-01 Thread Jud Craft
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Sorry, I forgot you said you'd take care of it. And, now it has been > updated. I guess you fixed it then, thanks Olav! > I'm not sure you can call it fixed if there's nothing there. The only previous version on Live Image was 2.26, which se

Re: Live media of GNOME 2.30

2010-04-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 01 avril 2010, à 10:37 -0400, Jud Craft a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > > Sorry, I forgot you said you'd take care of it. And, now it has been > > updated. I guess you fixed it then, thanks Olav! > > > > I'm not sure you can call it fixed if there's n