This is the exchange at Slate between Dennett and Hubert Dreyfus, who
follows M-P in phenomenological approaches to mind-body, etc. You have
to click on the little numbers after each piece to get to the next
one.
http://www.slate.com/id/3650/entry/23905/
CJ
--
Japan Higher Education Outlook
Antagonism:
Antagonism means "the mutual resistance or active opposition of two
opposing forces, physical or mental; active opposition to a force."
Antagonism is a form of change resolution by annihilation and
nullification. Antagonism as destruction, and nullification is a form of
soc
Dennett runs smack into M-P, but I can't remember if he actually
discusses him (I do remember the quick rendering of Husserl in order
to dismiss him in an earlier work). But this blog explains some more:
http://mikejohnduff.blogspot.com/2007/12/merleau-ponty-and-physicalism.html
_
mp;f=false
Jim Farmelant
http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant
-- Original Message --
From: CeJ
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Riddle of the Self
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:57:33 +0900
http://www.philosophos.com/philosophical_connection
http://www.philosophos.com/philosophical_connections/profile_115.html
Following from his rejection of dualism Merleau-Ponty argues that
thought is inseparable from language. He denies that we can have
concepts 'in the mind' before they are expressed or articulated
linguistically. New concepts are
CB: >>Is this excerpt sort of "what's in a name ? A rose by any other name
has an ineluctable essence remainder."<<
To put it schematically, in his last work, M-P is moving beyond his
re-working of Husserlian phenomenlogy and Sartre's existentialism. I
can't help but think he has taken on here st
Is this excerpt sort of "what's in a name ? A rose by any other name
has an ineluctable essence remainder."
On 3/31/10, CeJ wrote:
> I was reading through this online just before you posted this CB. I
> think for a complementary thinker who could be put in the Marxist
> traditions, it is Merleau-
Thanks for that CeJ. I went to that first link, and I could see how
M-P is complementary to M'ist tradition.
Levi-Strauss was associated with M-P , though I never studied their
connection much. He sounds left existential, and before Sartre was so
left, maybe.
I'm wondering if thinking of myself
I was reading through this online just before you posted this CB. I
think for a complementary thinker who could be put in the Marxist
traditions, it is Merleau-Ponty. M-P died at a relatively young 53.
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/merleaup.htm
http://plato.stanfor
