The current patch looks good to me... it satisfies all the use cases I
had in mind, and I can't think of much else that would be wanted.
Thanks!
I also very much like the idea of the "sizebar," although that's
probably a substantially larger job to implement. I may look into it
though, time permit
John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Manuel Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> With a clear checkout building the docs fails:
>>
>> [...]
>> Sphinx v0.4.2, building html
>> trying to load pickled env... not found
>> building [html]: targets for 348 source files that are out of date
Hi all,
I've submitted a patch to
matplotlib/lib/matplotlib/backends/backend_wx.py on the bug tracker
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2166139&group_id=80706&atid=560722
). I'd appreciate feedback on it and am looking forward to the
functionality making it into an upcoming rel
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Lee Kamentsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've submitted a patch to
> matplotlib/lib/matplotlib/backends/backend_wx.py on the bug tracker
> (http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2166139&group_id=80706&atid=560722
> ). I'd appreciate feedback o
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manuel Metz wrote:
>> Please see the end of the mail for the important point !!!
>
> Thank you--I see you are way ahead of me on this. See comments below.
>>
>> Eric Firing wrote:
>>> Manuel,
>>>
>>> Although it doesn't hurt
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:01 AM, David Huard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would oppose any change to histogram calling convention that does not
> fix a critical bug. I agree that using a built-in name as an argument is
> a bug, but I believe it is the lesser evil compared to asking users to
> ch
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:19 AM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:01 AM, David Huard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would oppose any change to histogram calling convention that does not
>> fix a critical bug. I agree that using a built-in name as an argument is
Thanks for your reply, John. It's mostly me being naive - my code works
great when I choose WXAgg as my backend. I'll be using that for now.
Feel free to accept / reject or ask for fixes to the patch.
--Lee
John Hunter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Lee Kamentsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Lee Kamentsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, John. It's mostly me being naive - my code works
> great when I choose WXAgg as my backend. I'll be using that for now. Feel
> free to accept / reject or ask for fixes to the patch.
OK, thanks. You
Hope nobody minds if I jump into this discussion:
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:55:06 -0500
> From: "John Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [...] could you tell us why you prefer or require backend wx over wxagg?
I tend to use matplotlib over an X connection, because the data I'm
working with is on a
Ben North wrote:
> I tend to use matplotlib over an X connection,
well, I think that is THE reason to choose wx over wxAgg (or GTK over
GTKAgg). However, I thought the newer versions of the wx back-end double
buffered, and thus pretty much eliminated the advantage anyway.
Also note that last I
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Christopher Barker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben North wrote:
>
>> I tend to use matplotlib over an X connection,
Yep, we know this reason. Lee stated he was on a windows box, which
doesn't rule out X11 forwarding but makes it less likely, so I was
wondering i
Actually, looking more closely, there is one thing that's still
bothering me: as it is now, it's impossible to have, say, 2 points
for plotted values, and 3 points for scatter plots on the same legend
(you have to give a numpoints=# command that's shared by everything in
the legend, if I'm underst
13 matches
Mail list logo
