Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-31 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > > I think that mc.ext should become a script some day. It would either > > run something itself or it would return a command (like %view) back to > > mc. It would be easier to write such rules without having to put them > > on one line. > > May be it worth the efforts to implement multil

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-29 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hello! Pavel Roskin wrote: +# View=%view{ascii} ar p %f control.tar.gz | tar xzO control ./control 2>/dev/null ; echo "" ; echo "Filelist:" ; ar p %f data.tar.gz | tar tzv That's something different. Checking for programs in PATH from mc.ext is not implemented, but it's planned. Stupid

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > > +# View=%view{ascii} ar p %f control.tar.gz | tar xzO control ./control > > 2>/dev/null ; echo "" ; echo "Filelist:" ; ar p %f data.tar.gz | tar tzv > > That's something different. Checking for programs in PATH from mc.ext is > not implemented, but it's planned. Stupid me :-( I

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > > > Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is > > > that rpm option order sensitive. > > > > It's working fine. Thank you! > > hmm. > then the same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems, > to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed: Yes, exce

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Arpi
Hi, > Hello! > > > Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is > > that rpm option order sensitive. > > It's working fine. Thank you! hmm. then teh same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems, to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed: +# for dpkg-le

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is > that rpm option order sensitive. It's working fine. Thank you! -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-27 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Hello, Arpi Fixed in CVS: 2002-12-29 Andrew V. Samoilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * extfs/rpm: Use --nosignature only if rpm supports this. but in mc.ext it's still there: # RPM packages (SuSE uses *.spm for source packages) regex/\.(rpm|spm)$ Open=%cd %p#rpm View=%view{a

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-25 Thread Arpi
Hi, > Fixed in CVS: > 2002-12-29 Andrew V. Samoilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * extfs/rpm: Use --nosignature only if rpm supports this. but in mc.ext it's still there: # RPM packages (SuSE uses *.spm for source packages) regex/\.(rpm|spm)$ Open=%cd %p#rpm View=%view{asc

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-23 Thread Andrew V. Samoilov
Pavel Roskin wrote: Hello! It could be a good idea to remove the "--nosignature" options (rpm) from the extension files. As an example, neither Mandrake's RPM 4.0.3 (Mandrake 8.2) nor 4.0.4 (Mandrake 9.0) has this option. (Is it RH-specific, or is it only present in newer versions?) The CHAN

Re: rpm --nosignature

2003-01-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > It could be a good idea to remove the "--nosignature" options (rpm) > from the extension files. As an example, neither Mandrake's RPM 4.0.3 > (Mandrake 8.2) nor 4.0.4 (Mandrake 9.0) has this option. > (Is it RH-specific, or is it only present in newer versions?) The CHANGES file in rpm-4