Hello!
> > I think that mc.ext should become a script some day. It would either
> > run something itself or it would return a command (like %view) back to
> > mc. It would be easier to write such rules without having to put them
> > on one line.
>
> May be it worth the efforts to implement multil
Hello!
Pavel Roskin wrote:
+# View=%view{ascii} ar p %f control.tar.gz | tar xzO control ./control
2>/dev/null ; echo "" ; echo "Filelist:" ; ar p %f data.tar.gz | tar tzv
That's something different. Checking for programs in PATH from mc.ext is
not implemented, but it's planned.
Stupid
Hello!
> > +# View=%view{ascii} ar p %f control.tar.gz | tar xzO control ./control
> > 2>/dev/null ; echo "" ; echo "Filelist:" ; ar p %f data.tar.gz | tar tzv
>
> That's something different. Checking for programs in PATH from mc.ext is
> not implemented, but it's planned.
Stupid me :-(
I
Hello!
> > > Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is
> > > that rpm option order sensitive.
> >
> > It's working fine. Thank you!
>
> hmm.
> then the same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems,
> to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed:
Yes, exce
Hi,
> Hello!
>
> > Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is
> > that rpm option order sensitive.
>
> It's working fine. Thank you!
hmm.
then teh same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems,
to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed:
+# for dpkg-le
Hello!
> Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is
> that rpm option order sensitive.
It's working fine. Thank you!
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
Mc-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
Hello, Arpi
Fixed in CVS:
2002-12-29 Andrew V. Samoilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* extfs/rpm: Use --nosignature only if rpm supports this.
but in mc.ext it's still there:
# RPM packages (SuSE uses *.spm for source packages)
regex/\.(rpm|spm)$
Open=%cd %p#rpm
View=%view{a
Hi,
> Fixed in CVS:
> 2002-12-29 Andrew V. Samoilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * extfs/rpm: Use --nosignature only if rpm supports this.
but in mc.ext it's still there:
# RPM packages (SuSE uses *.spm for source packages)
regex/\.(rpm|spm)$
Open=%cd %p#rpm
View=%view{asc
Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello!
It could be a good idea to remove the "--nosignature" options (rpm)
from the extension files. As an example, neither Mandrake's RPM 4.0.3
(Mandrake 8.2) nor 4.0.4 (Mandrake 9.0) has this option.
(Is it RH-specific, or is it only present in newer versions?)
The CHAN
Hello!
> It could be a good idea to remove the "--nosignature" options (rpm)
> from the extension files. As an example, neither Mandrake's RPM 4.0.3
> (Mandrake 8.2) nor 4.0.4 (Mandrake 9.0) has this option.
> (Is it RH-specific, or is it only present in newer versions?)
The CHANGES file in rpm-4
10 matches
Mail list logo