are you using dns to resolve the IP's of the clients?
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Jim Horning wrote:
> I have two conditions that seem to make memcached fail. I have a memcached
> server and a few clients all on the same subnet: 192.168.1.X, where these
> devices use NAT to get to the Internet.
> 1.
I have two conditions that seem to make memcached fail. I have a memcached
server and a few clients all on the same subnet: 192.168.1.X, where these
devices use NAT to get to the Internet.
1. If I start up the sever/clients AND the Internet connection is not
available (i.e. I disconnect the
No. I'm using the numeric addresses.
On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-7, Jim Horning wrote:
>
> I have two conditions that seem to make memcached fail. I have a
> memcached server and a few clients all on the same subnet: 192.168.1.X,
> where these devices use NAT to get to the
Oops, looks like the latest code didn't get into production today. I'm
building it again, same plan as before.
On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 4:38:00 PM UTC-7, Dormando wrote:
>
> Looking forward to the results. Thanks for getting on this so quickly.
>
> I think there's still a bug in tracking
ah. I pushed two more changes earlier. should fix mem_requested. just cosmetic
stuff though
> On Oct 6, 2015, at 12:13 AM, Scott Mansfield wrote:
>
> Oops, looks like the latest code didn't get into production today. I'm
> building it again, same plan as before.
>
>>