This fixes two issues. First, we had a use-after-free in the case where
the instruction got deleted and we tried to return mov->dest.write_mask.
Second, in the case where we are doing a self-mov of a register, we delete
those channels that are moved to themselves from the write-mask. This
means t
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This fixes two issues. First, we had a use-after-free in the case where
> the instruction got deleted and we tried to return mov->dest.write_mask.
> Second, in the case where we are doing a self-mov of a register, we delete
> those channels
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > This fixes two issues. First, we had a use-after-free in the case where
> > the instruction got deleted and we tried to return mov->dest.write_mask.
> > Second, in the case where w