Am 13.01.2014 22:00, schrieb Andreas Hartmetz:
I don't have an fdo account or push rights. Can somebody else push it
for me please? I've added the Reviewed-by: lines so the patches only
need to be pushed now.
You should consider registering an account if you are planning to do
more work on mes
Pushed, thanks.
Marek
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> I don't have an fdo account or push rights. Can somebody else push it
> for me please? I've added the Reviewed-by: lines so the patches only
> need to be pushed now.
>
> On Monday 13 January 2014 11:22:07 Marek Olš
I don't have an fdo account or push rights. Can somebody else push it
for me please? I've added the Reviewed-by: lines so the patches only
need to be pushed now.
On Monday 13 January 2014 11:22:07 Marek Olšák wrote:
> For the series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
>
> Feel free to push this.
>
>
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Feel free to push this.
Marek
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> Continuing here because the threads had diverged...
>
> I've updated the patch series under the same URL and applied all the
> suggested improvements. The variable
Continuing here because the threads had diverged...
I've updated the patch series under the same URL and applied all the
suggested improvements. The variable renames are still in, but at the
very end so they are trivial to omit.
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 17:27:56 Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> We hav
Do you think it's too much change in general or that the patches are
too large? They were honestly simple find / sed jobs, so I could fairly
easily redo them file by file.
I'm not sure how to even argue about that, but I think suitable names
are very important. rctx goes as "mysterious name" /
"his
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 17:37:07 Christian König wrote:
> Don't worry to much about history keeping, anybody who really needs that
> should be capable of digging that up anyway.
>
> I would just squash together the changes "Apply si_ file naming scheme
> in src/gallium/drive…" and "Fix up file
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Don't worry to much about history keeping, anybody who really needs that
> should be capable of digging that up anyway.
>
> I would just squash together the changes "Apply si_ file naming scheme in
> src/gallium/drive…" and "Fix up file rena
I agree with everything except these two:
"Rename the commonly occurring rctx/r600 to now more suitable sctx."
"Rename the commonly occurring rscreen to now more suitable sscreen."
It's too much for my eye to handle.
Marek
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> We have talke
Don't worry to much about history keeping, anybody who really needs that
should be capable of digging that up anyway.
I would just squash together the changes "Apply si_ file naming scheme
in src/gallium/drive…" and "Fix up file renaming: change file names in
commen…". Also please change the s
We have talked on IRC meanwhile:
"Everywhere" was supposed to mean file names and data structures.
I have made a patch series (git link because file renames produce huge
diffs) that renames *everything* away from r600 (and also radeonsi)
to si, where it is actually about SI. In the such modified c
It sounds good, but I'd like the prefix to be si_ everywhere.
Marek
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> many of the files in radeonsi originally came from other places where
> they had different names and were never renamed.
> Most of them now have names that don
Hello,
many of the files in radeonsi originally came from other places where
they had different names and were never renamed.
Most of them now have names that don't tell what the files are for
(r600 is not actually the first hardware supported by them, they start
at radeonsi), and even those with
13 matches
Mail list logo
