On Thursday 19 February 2015 11:39:13 Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 12/09/2014 02:52 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> > From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
> >
> > GLSL 1.50 and GLSL 4.40 specs, they both say the same in
> > "Interface Blocks" section:
> >
> > "If no optional qualifier is used in a member
On Wednesday 18 February 2015 11:51:45 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> > From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
> >
> > GLSL 1.50 and GLSL 4.40 specs, they both say the same in
> > "Interface Blocks" section:
> >
> > "If no optional qualifier is used in
On 12/09/2014 02:52 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
>
> GLSL 1.50 and GLSL 4.40 specs, they both say the same in
> "Interface Blocks" section:
>
> "If no optional qualifier is used in a member-declaration, the qualification
> of
> the member includes all in, out,
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
>
> GLSL 1.50 and GLSL 4.40 specs, they both say the same in
> "Interface Blocks" section:
>
> "If no optional qualifier is used in a member-declaration, the qualification
> of
> the member includes all i
From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
GLSL 1.50 and GLSL 4.40 specs, they both say the same in
"Interface Blocks" section:
"If no optional qualifier is used in a member-declaration, the qualification of
the member includes all in, out, patch, uniform, or buffer as determined by
interface-qualifier. If
