2010/2/8 Kristian Høgsberg :
> 2010/2/6 Chia-I Wu :
>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 07:24:00PM -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>>> These two patches move things around in GLX a bit. To make it possible
>>> to use libGL with EGL on framebuffer without pulling in X dependencies
>>> this patch make the GL
2010/2/8 Kristian Høgsberg :
> 2010/2/6 Chia-I Wu :
>>
>> We can then build libGL.so with or without libglx.a depending on the
>> configure optins. Later, src/mesa/drivers/x11/ could be changed to
>> build libglxsw.a. We will be able to choose between 3 flavors of
>> libGL.so, or choose all of th
2010/2/6 Chia-I Wu :
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 07:24:00PM -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> These two patches move things around in GLX a bit. To make it possible
>> to use libGL with EGL on framebuffer without pulling in X dependencies
>> this patch make the GLX entry points and all the indirect
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 07:24:00PM -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> These two patches move things around in GLX a bit. To make it possible
> to use libGL with EGL on framebuffer without pulling in X dependencies
> this patch make the GLX entry points and all the indirect API a
> ./configure time
These two patches move things around in GLX a bit. To make it possible
to use libGL with EGL on framebuffer without pulling in X dependencies
this patch make the GLX entry points and all the indirect API a
./configure time option. When disabled, libGL is essentially just glapi
and needs libEGL to
