Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/9] move BSPs to v3.10 kernel + a misc commit

2013-09-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
x86_64-linux" > > NATIVELSBSTRING = "Fedora-17" > > TARGET_SYS= "x86_64-poky-linux" > > MACHINE = "sugarbay" > > DISTRO= "poky" > > DISTRO_VERSION= "1.4+snapshot-20130906" > > TUNE_FEATU

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/9] move BSPs to v3.10 kernel + a misc commit

2013-09-06 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
#x27;m getting a build error: > > Build Configuration: > BB_VERSION= "1.19.1" > BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" > NATIVELSBSTRING = "Fedora-17" > TARGET_SYS= "x86_64-poky-linux" > MACHINE = "sugarbay" > DIS

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/9] move BSPs to v3.10 kernel + a misc commit

2013-09-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
g a build error: Build Configuration: BB_VERSION= "1.19.1" BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "Fedora-17" TARGET_SYS= "x86_64-poky-linux" MACHINE = "sugarbay" DISTRO= "poky" DISTRO_VERSION

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 4/5] xf86-video-intel: mark opengl as a required distro feature

2013-09-06 Thread Burton, Ross
On 6 September 2013 17:00, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: > Even though it is technically possible, it will be crippling the Intel > graphics driver. > Do we have to do it? Is the other, non-crippling option of requesting opengl > distro > feature so bad? Feel free to put a comment along the lines that

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 4/5] xf86-video-intel: mark opengl as a required distro feature

2013-09-06 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
> -Original Message- > From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 3:21 AM > To: Darren Hart > Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; Zanussi, Tom; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Purdie, > Richard; Wold, Saul > Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 4/5] xf86-video-intel: m

Re: [meta-intel] [OE-core] [Patch-v2 1/1] mesa: avoid unnecessary rerunning of tasks

2013-09-06 Thread Burton, Ross
On 5 September 2013 09:33, Richard Purdie wrote: > I'd also appreciate someone (Ross maybe?) confirming that if we build > application A against mesa, then change over to a machine that uses emgd > and swizzle the libs around in the sysroot, do we need to recompile the > app? This approach is assu

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 4/5] xf86-video-intel: mark opengl as a required distro feature

2013-09-06 Thread Darren Hart
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 18:59 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 6 September 2013 17:00, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: > > Even though it is technically possible, it will be crippling the Intel > > graphics driver. > > Do we have to do it? Is the other, non-crippling option of requesting > > opengl distro >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 4/5] xf86-video-intel: mark opengl as a required distro feature

2013-09-06 Thread Burton, Ross
On 5 September 2013 18:42, Darren Hart wrote: >> > 2) configure has a --disable-dri option, did you see if this works? >> > Glancing at the source there might actually be a hard dependency on DRI >> > headers, but that can be something we can fix in the X server. >> >> Why do you want to remove th