I need to do exactly the same thing in the next 2-3 months. Thanks for
bringing this matter to the attention of the members of the mailing list.
Best Regards
Peter
On Wed, 16 May 2018 at 16:20, Martin Lund wrote:
> Hi Manju,
>
> Thank you for your answers - please see my responses below.
>
> >>
Hi Jean-Francois,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Francois Dagenais [mailto:jeff.dagen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 8:57 AM
> To: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org; Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
>
> Cc: nat...@nathanrossi.com; Jean-Francois Dagenais
> Subject: [PATCH] bootbin
Hi Nathan,
From: Nathan Rossi
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 13:20
To: Martin Siegumfeldt
Cc: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]
On 16 May 2018 at 18:24, Martin Siegumfeldt wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
>
> I do
This problem was introduced by a622db96dd962c9a5ceb999ccd99da7ad7a40faf
>From documentation of DEPENDS variable:
[...]This mechanism is implemented by having do_configure depend on the
do_populate_sysroot task of each recipe listed in DEPENDS[...]
This is why the xilinx-bootbin:do_configure task
Hi Manju,
Thank you for your answers - please see my responses below.
>> We are trying to put together a system built on top of the meta-xilinx-bsp
>> layer
>> and we have done so successfully up until the v2017.4 release with a few
>> helpful
>> patches from this excellent community. That is,
Hi Richard,
On 16/05/2018 14:38, richard-bai...@sti-limited.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I was just wondering how the yoctoproject.org meta-xilinx relates to the
> github hosted version.
>
> Is it a mirror or are there some changes? Is it updated immediately? Are
> there any advantages to using e
Hmm, thanks for your input Nathan...
Br,
Martin
From: Nathan Rossi
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:01:02 PM
To: Martin Siegumfeldt
Cc: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]
On 16 May 2018 at 22:43, Marti
On 16 May 2018 at 22:43, Martin Siegumfeldt wrote:
> So you have a distro configuration overriding a machine defined provider - I
> did not see that coming, thanks for pointing that out. It seems to be of
> version 2017.3:
>
>
> martin@dell:~/work/petalinux/build$ ll tmp/deploy/images/zcu102-zynqm
Hi,
I was just wondering how the yoctoproject.org meta-xilinx relates to the github
hosted version.
Is it a mirror or are there some changes? Is it updated immediately? Are there
any advantages to using either?
Thanks,
Richard.
Richard Bailey
Senior Software Engineer
T:
+44 0203 393 1216
So you have a distro configuration overriding a machine defined provider - I
did not see that coming, thanks for pointing that out. It seems to be of
version 2017.3:
martin@dell:~/work/petalinux/build$ ll tmp/deploy/images/zcu102-zynqmp/pmu-*
-rw-r--r-- 2 martin martin 129760 May 16 14:34
tmp/
On 16 May 2018 at 22:01, Martin Siegumfeldt wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
>
>
> From: Nathan Rossi
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 13:20
> To: Martin Siegumfeldt
> Cc: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]
>
> On
On 16 May 2018 at 18:24, Martin Siegumfeldt wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
>
> I don't quite follow you here - the PMU provider of zcu102 is:
>
>
> martin@dell:~/work/petalinux/build$ cat
> ../sources/meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-bsp/conf/machine/zcu102-zynqmp.conf |
> grep PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/pmu
> PREF
Hi Nathan,
I don't quite follow you here - the PMU provider of zcu102 is:
martin@dell:~/work/petalinux/build$ cat
../sources/meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-bsp/conf/machine/zcu102-zynqmp.conf | grep
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/pmu
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/pmu-firmware ?= "zynqmp-pmu-pmu-firmware"
13 matches
Mail list logo