Re: [meteorite-list] Tunguska rates

2009-11-15 Thread E.P. Grondine
llection wrote: > From: The Tricottet Collection > Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Tunguska rates > To: "E.P. Grondine" , "MeteoriteList" > > Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 3:01 AM > > Hi E.P. et al., > > actually, what the journalist of BI wrote

Re: [meteorite-list] Tunguska rates

2009-11-15 Thread The Tricottet Collection
noted that the rate could be far higher if hypotheses from geomythology and related were to be verified. Best, ArnaudM > Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:20:11 -0800 > From: epgrond...@yahoo.com > To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > Subject: [meteorite-list] Tunguska rates > &g

[meteorite-list] Tunguska rates

2009-11-14 Thread E.P. Grondine
Hi Arnauld, all, The problem is that Tunguska type blasts have been occuring recently (for the last 5,000 years) at a rate of 1 per 100 years, not 1 per 1,000. Whether this represents a short term phenonmenon or the long term rate is not currently known. I used to put together catalogues of "