llection wrote:
> From: The Tricottet Collection
> Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Tunguska rates
> To: "E.P. Grondine" , "MeteoriteList"
>
> Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 3:01 AM
>
> Hi E.P. et al.,
>
> actually, what the journalist of BI wrote
noted that the rate could be far higher
if hypotheses from geomythology and related were to be verified.
Best,
ArnaudM
> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:20:11 -0800
> From: epgrond...@yahoo.com
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Tunguska rates
>
&g
Hi Arnauld, all,
The problem is that Tunguska type blasts have been occuring recently (for the
last 5,000 years) at a rate of 1 per 100 years, not 1 per 1,000. Whether this
represents a short term phenonmenon or the long term rate is not currently
known.
I used to put together catalogues of "
3 matches
Mail list logo