--- David Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2006/pdf/5288.pdf
>
> Interestingly, in the same abstract, results of new
> O-isotopic studies
> have determined that NWA 1054 is not an acapulcoite
> as it is presently
> classified, but is likely paired wi
Hello Adam,
I would like to thank you and your brother for your generous
contribution to my website/collection of your "first true brachinite
from the Sahara", NWA 3151. You have implied that the previously
considered first Saharan brachinite, NWA 595, was now determined not to
be a member of
2 matches
Mail list logo
