Scott Reynen wrote:
> But I also think it's both a rare and a bad practice to
> use one symbol to communicate two different ideas
> in a single context.
It may be rare in the use-cases you've seen, but in content that I expect to
be publishing soon it will be the norm, not just isolated special
On 12/14/06, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just curious, what did you mean by "double entendre markup?"
It means 'double meaning'.
-Ciaran McNulty
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microform
Ciaran McNulty write:
> On 12/14/06, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just curious, what did you mean by "double entendre markup?"
> It means 'double meaning'.
A "double entendre" often refers to something with a negative
meaning. I was basically asking if that's what he was implying
On 12/14/06, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A "double entendre" often refers to something with a negative
meaning. I was basically asking if that's what he was implying without being
defensive.
Oh, right. Sorry.
I didn't read any particularly negative meaning into it, I assumed
Sc
On Dec 14, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
Ciaran McNulty write:
On 12/14/06, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just curious, what did you mean by "double entendre markup?"
It means 'double meaning'.
A "double entendre" often refers to something with a negative
meaning. I wa
