[Mimedefang] Warning: unable to close filehandle LOGF properly.

2004-08-31 Thread Tory Blue
Did a search and a few people see this but no answers. Did I miss something running Mime 2.44/clamav/sendmail 8.13 on a Linux box mimedefang-multiplexor[15477]: Slave 1 stderr: Warning: unable to close filehandle LOGF properly. Thanks Tory ___ Visit h

Re: [Mimedefang] Virus sneaking through

2004-08-31 Thread Rob MacGregor
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:43:20 -0500 (CDT), -ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We noticed a new virus sneaking through our filter today. Attachment is > called foto.zip or fotos.zip. Clamav detects it as > Trojan.Dropper.Small-11 (scanned mimedefang ./Work dir). I turned on > ScanMail in clamav

[Mimedefang] Virus sneaking through

2004-08-31 Thread -ray
All, We noticed a new virus sneaking through our filter today. Attachment is called foto.zip or fotos.zip. Clamav detects it as Trojan.Dropper.Small-11 (scanned mimedefang ./Work dir). I turned on ScanMail in clamav but it still gets through. Anyone seen this before? Is this a case for acti

Re: [Mimedefang] Inoffizial MIME-tools-5.411a-RP-Patched-05 available (includes a new data corruption fix)

2004-08-31 Thread David F. Skoll
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Martin Blapp wrote: > - MS Outlook quoted printable encoded files were corrupted (carriage > returns missing) if they were decoded by MIME-Tools. This version > contains a workaround so action_rebuild() should be safe again (for > PDF files). (patch partly from MailScanner) T

Re: [Mimedefang] greylisting and pop-before-smtp don't play together

2004-08-31 Thread Martin Blapp
hi, > > I'm looking for suggestion to get pop-before-smtp (actually > > imaps-before-smtp) and greylisting to play nicely together. > > Helpful hint: don't. pop-before-SMTP is a pain, and one you can be This problem is quite easy to solve. Let the MX for your domain point to one IP adress and d

Re: [Mimedefang] greylisting and pop-before-smtp don't play together

2004-08-31 Thread Jeff Rife
On 31 Aug 2004 at 16:31, James Miller wrote: > The problem is the greylisting function doesn't know about and/or doesn't > exempt the newly authenticated imap clients and when they try to send a > message they get the '4.3.0 message to try again in 1min'. As other messages have pointed out, POP-b

Re: [Mimedefang] greylisting and pop-before-smtp don't play together

2004-08-31 Thread Jan Pieter Cornet
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:31:30PM -0500, James Miller wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for suggestion to get pop-before-smtp (actually > imaps-before-smtp) and greylisting to play nicely together. Helpful hint: don't. pop-before-SMTP is a pain, and one you can be without in a modern world. Every

[Mimedefang] greylisting and pop-before-smtp don't play together

2004-08-31 Thread James Miller
Hi all, I'm looking for suggestion to get pop-before-smtp (actually imaps-before-smtp) and greylisting to play nicely together. The pop-before-smtp implementation I'm using is from http://popbsmtp.sourceforge.net/. It creates a popauth.db {Berkeley DB (Hash, version 7, native byte-order)} file t

RE: [Mimedefang] Max recipient

2004-08-31 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew.van.Eerde wrote: > No need for Mimedefang-ery. You can do this in Sendmail directly by > defining the SMTP_MAILER_MAXRCPTS option in your .mc file. > > http://www.sendmail.org/m4/ostype.html#SMTP_MAILER_MAXRCPTS Er, actually for non-ancient

RE: [Mimedefang] Max recipient

2004-08-31 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim McCullars wrote: > On 31 Aug 2004, CONTRERAS, Pablo wrote: > >> Hi, I want set mimedefang for max recipients with ingoing mail, when >> the number of recipients is more than 5, then mimedefang? reply with >> a message, for example: our server not

Re: [Mimedefang] Max recipient

2004-08-31 Thread Jim McCullars
On 31 Aug 2004, CONTRERAS, Pablo wrote: > Hi, I want set mimedefang for max recipients with ingoing mail, when the > number of recipients is more than 5, then mimedefang? reply with a > message, for example: our server not admit more than 5 recipient, > Is it posible? This should do it (unte

[Mimedefang] Inoffizial MIME-tools-5.411a-RP-Patched-05 available (includes a new data corruption fix)

2004-08-31 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I just put up a new patched version of MIME-tools online: http://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/distfiles/MIME-tools-5.411a-RP-Patched-05.tar.gz Changes: - MS Outlook quoted printable encoded files were corrupted (carriage returns missing) if they were decoded by MIME-Tools. This version cont

[Mimedefang] Max recipient

2004-08-31 Thread CONTRERAS, Pablo
Hi, I want set mimedefang for max recipients with ingoing mail, when the number of recipients is more than 5, then mimedefang? reply with a message, for example: our server not admit more than 5 recipient, Is it posible? Best Regards Pablo ___ Visit

[Mimedefang] Log reason for tempfail?

2004-08-31 Thread Dan Tulovsky
Hello. Does anyone know a way to log the reason for a message being tempfailed? I have some messages getting tempfailed, but I can't see the reason why. Thank you Dan ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list

[Mimedefang] Re: milter-greylist

2004-08-31 Thread John Kirkland
> To my inexperienced eye it seems extremely elegant/sensible to > separate this functionality out of MimeDefang - gives MimeDefang less > to do, simplifies filters, etc. Does anyone know better? The very first greylisting implementation that I used was milter-greylist, but I found that some virus

[Mimedefang] Intermittent case of SA not groking correct configuration?

2004-08-31 Thread Jason Gurtz
This intermittent problem is manifested by spam that comes through without the Subject: header being rewritten and tagged with **SPAM**. The other symptom is the X-Spam-Status: header which doesn't seem right, especially given the X-Spam-Score: header content :) I've included an example i