On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:25:18 -0400 (EDT), David F. Skoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all.
The ignoramuses at RFC-Ignorant have decided to blacklist roaringpenguin.com.
Looks like they're removed it:
roaringpenguin.com (No Longer Listed) [approved by dredd, removed by dredd]
--
Rob
BTW, does anyone know of an automated piece of code that checks a list of
dnsbl's like this for one's own domain? It would be nice to have rapid
notice of any listing in the many blacklists out there.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and
--On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 8:37 AM +0100 Rob MacGregor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like they're removed it:
roaringpenguin.com (No Longer Listed) [approved by dredd, removed by
dredd]
I still see a listing:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=roaringpenguin.comfull=1
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:48:21AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
roaringpenguin.com (No Longer Listed) [approved by dredd, removed by
dredd]
I still see a listing:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=roaringpenguin.comfull=1
An earlier one was removed.
And it looks like
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Richard Laager wrote:
From my e-mails to the admin of rfc-ignorant.org, I believe the stance
is that postmaster (case-insensitive with or without the domain) must
accept mail from anyone. The basis cited for this is RFC 2821,
specifically section 4.5.1:
Dredd is totally
One of Can-It's competitors must have a mindpsring connection, David.
;
The person who submitted the report is Derek Balling
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and I think he's misguided rather than
malicious. (I think he's the founder of milter.org - right?)
Since the IP address belongs to mindspring, and
Here's a good place to check in mass.
http://rbls.org/
From: Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] roaringpenguin.com is listed in rfc-ignorant
BTW, does anyone know of an automated piece of code that checks a list of
dnsbl's like this for one's own domain? It would be
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
I will be writing an article about this and posting it on our Web site.
It's a great illustration of the dangers of placing your trust in RBLs.
May I suggest rephrasing that to read blind trust. I have used many
RBLs over the years and I agree that
I'm a little confused about the roaringpenguin policy.
According to the evidence file
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.php?domain=roaringpenguin.comsubmitted=1096422688table=postmaster
the SMTP conversation went like this:
MAIL FROM: (OK)
RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK)
DATA
blah blah
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little confused about the roaringpenguin policy.
We delay the rejection to after the DATA because some other zealous
sites (eg SourceForge) do a postmaster check if you try to mail them.
Accepting the RCPT command fools these overzealous sites
Am 29.09.04 um 09:45 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now that I think of it, I can't imagine a situation when a legitimate
MAIL FROM: would have multiple RCPT TO's.
There is one:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +
[EMAIL PROTECTED], so that mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets
David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi, all.
The ignoramuses at RFC-Ignorant have decided to blacklist roaringpenguin.com.
Details at:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.php?domain=roaringpenguin.comsubmitted=1087414364table=postmaster
Note the final line on that page. Ironic, isn't it?
I have a
Doug Brott wrote:
David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi, all.
The ignoramuses at RFC-Ignorant have decided to blacklist
roaringpenguin.com.
Details at:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.php?domain=roaringpenguin.comsubmitted=1087414364table=postmaster
Note the final line on that page. Ironic, isn't
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:01:15 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone already done something like this and is willing to share code? Or
perhaps has another approach?
Ok, as follows, watch the line wraps:
purge_md()
{
BASE=/var/spool/MD-Quarantine # Where
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 00:57, Lucas Albers wrote:
Anyone else encountered this problem?
Yes, and if you read the README of Spamassassin, you know why.
Dirk
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
Matthew,
My /var/spool/MD-Quarantine directory starts to get full
after a while.
I'm thinking of writing a cron.monthly script.
#!/bin/csh
find /var/spool/MD-Quarantine -type d -mtime +60 -exec mv {} /data/archive/`date
+%y-%b` \;
cd /data/archive/`date +%y-%b`
tar cvf archive.tar qdir*
Is there any way for the same message to be bounced, AND send a copy to
postmaster? Until I get comfortable with SpamAssassin, I'd like Postmaster
to take a look at what's bouncing.
It's easy to do one or the other - I've done
add_recipient('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');
return ();
Tim Boyer wrote:
Is there any way for the same message to be bounced, AND send a copy to
postmaster? Until I get comfortable with SpamAssassin, I'd like Postmaster
to take a look at what's bouncing.
Call resend_message('[EMAIL PROTECTED]') before action_bounce.
That should do it, as long as you
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what you want to do is set @Recipients =
('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');, send a bounce message to the SMTP
sending agent, and deliver the message anyway?
I believe that can actually be done but it requires a patch to
libmilter (to allow simultaneous
Kelson wrote:
Tim Boyer wrote:
Is there any way for the same message to be bounced, AND send a copy to
postmaster? Until I get comfortable with SpamAssassin, I'd like
Postmaster
to take a look at what's bouncing.
Alternatively, you can quarantine the message (using
quarantine_entire_message)
Here is a patch to mimedefang-2.45 to support Command Anti-Virus (csav)
Regards
--
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
Unless you are named Alfred E. Newman, you may read
Hi,
Yes, there are some complains about Perl module versions on my Solaris 8
x86 with Perl 5.8.4 + MIME-tools-5.413 (downloaded from www.mimedefang.org).
There are complains from ./configure:
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output... a.out
checking whether the C compiler
22 matches
Mail list logo
