Dear Ray,
On 16.08.2016 13:01, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> Hi Mario,
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Mario Emmenlauer
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I don't know how/where to report this or how to debug the issue,
>> please let me know what I can do. I tried upgrading protobuf to the
>> new 3.
Hello dw,
2016-08-17 4:22 GMT+02:00 David Wohlferd :
> One of my upcoming patches is going to be a bit controversial (or maybe
> I'm just missing something). In either case, I'm going to go ahead and
> start the discussion early.
>
> First a bit of vocabulary. I'm not including this because I th
Hi Jacek,
patch is ok.
Thanks,
Kai
2016-08-16 14:52 GMT+02:00 Jacek Caban :
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
> ---
> mingw-w64-headers/include/wincodec.h | 16 -
> mingw-w64-headers/include/wincodec.idl | 17 --
> mingw-w64-headers/include/winerror.h | 41
>
I ran into exactly this issue when building protobuf 3.0.0. One of the
checks freezes. Ended up not running checks and the lib works fine.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Mario Emmenlauer
wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I don't know how/where to report this or how to debug the issue,
> please let m
On 8/16/2016 11:43 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, David Wohlferd wrote:
>> The next warnings to clean up (unused.patch) are pretty simple. Just a few
>> unused params. Note that since gs_support.c only leaves the param unused for
>> ARM, using __UNUSED_PARAM is impractical.
> Thi
2016-08-17 22:08 GMT+02:00 David Wohlferd :
> I'm reluctant to get too far ahead when creating patches. My skills
> with git just aren't up to it.
>
>
I can strongly suggest Sourcetree. With it, you can go line by line through
source files and add only the bits and pieces you want to a commit. It
On 8/17/2016 1:16 PM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2016-08-17 22:08 GMT+02:00 David Wohlferd :
>> I'm reluctant to get too far ahead when creating patches. My skills
>> with git just aren't up to it.
> I can strongly suggest Sourcetree. With it, you can go line by line through
> source files and add o
Huh. Well, that went a lot better than I thought it would...
On 8/17/2016 1:11 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello dw,
>
> 2016-08-17 4:22 GMT+02:00 David Wohlferd :
>> One of my upcoming patches is going to be a bit controversial (or maybe
>> I'm just missing something). In either case, I'm going to g
