relayd 5.1 vs. relayd 5.2

Hello, I have two machines in production, M1 and M2. M1 : OpenBSD M1 5.1 GENERIC.MP#207 amd64 M2 : OpenBSD M2 5.2 GENERIC.MP#368 amd64 Both machines have relayd as reversed proxy and ssl acceleration for a default install Apache 1.3 non-chroot running on localhost. On both machines the relayd

snapshot ssh: ChrootDirectory sftp Connection closed

server kern.version=OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #71: Sat Apr 13 17:21:57 MDT 2013 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP /etc/ssh/sshd_config only add after last line Match Group share ForceCommand internal-sftp ChrootDirectory /home/chroot/

Important: following -current update!

While it's often the case that you can leave our steps when building -current from source, it is sometimes ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED that you followed the steps precisely. This is one of those times. If you build a -current kernel without running config(8) and "make clean", then the resulting kernel WI

Re: mixing ports and non-ports programs

> You can very well roll your own package. After all, the pkg tools are > fully documented in that respect. But you can't expect to uninstall a > package and have stuff that depends on it still work. So the easiest way, > seriously, is to create a newer package. Don't fight the system. > > If yo

Re: FAQ - Disk Imaging

On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:27:57AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > 4.15 of the faq says > > Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are > FFS-aware. > > I haven't tested whether a broad brush had been applied expecting > ufs and ffs to be the same or if clonezillas statement

Re: smtpd vs sendmail cronjob

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:20:21PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > The smtpd(8) manpage documents the steps needed > to replace the default sendmail with smtpd. > > However, it does not mention the > "sendmail clientmqueue runner" cronjob. > > That should probably be edited from > the root's cronjob, r