Re: Bug with PF IPv6 subnet calculation, or my brain?

2011-02-01 Thread Brian Keefer
On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:51:00PM -0800, Brian Keefer wrote: > | 4.9 GENERIC#626 i386 > | > | I write a rule that says this: > | pass in on $ext_if inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:0100:900f:c9::/56 > | > | and pfctl shows this: > | pass i

Re: Bug with PF IPv6 subnet calculation, or my brain?

2011-02-01 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:51:00PM -0800, Brian Keefer wrote: | 4.9 GENERIC#626 i386 | | I write a rule that says this: | pass in on $ext_if inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:0100:900f:c9::/56 | | and pfctl shows this: | pass in on em2 inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:100:900f::/56 kee

Bug with PF IPv6 subnet calculation, or my brain?

2011-02-01 Thread Brian Keefer
4.9 GENERIC#626 i386 I write a rule that says this: pass in on $ext_if inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:0100:900f:c9::/56 and pfctl shows this: pass in on em2 inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:100:900f::/56 keep state Maybe I'm crazy, but it seems 2620:100:900f:: would be /48 (assumin