On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:50:41AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:43:06AM +, John Long wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:48:44PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote:
> > > > Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesys
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:43:06AM +, John Long wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:48:44PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote:
> > > Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without
> > > impacting performance or integrity issues?
> >
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:48:44PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote:
> > Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without
> > impacting performance or integrity issues?
>
> The people who wrote the code set the limit at 95%...so if you are
>
On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote:
> Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without
> impacting performance or integrity issues?
The people who wrote the code set the limit at 95%...so if you are
looking for a "Rule of Thumb"...that's it, provided by the People Who
Kno
Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without
impacting performance or integrity issues?
Thanks,
/jl
--
ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong
against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD
and proprietary/ \http://www.mutt.org
atta
5 matches
Mail list logo