Re: Memory usage of BIND process - threads?

2012-04-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/04/21 11:54, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > > In -current this has changed however in OpenBSD BIND is built without > > threads anyway. > > Doesn't this affect BIND's performance? > Anyway, a stress test will tell... Untested but in 5.1 and earlier I doubt you will see an improvement with thr

Re: Memory usage of BIND process - threads?

2012-04-21 Thread Kostas Zorbadelos
Stuart Henderson writes: > On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: >> Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2 >> processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have >> no threads (using T under top(1)). > > In 5.0 and 5.1 threads are entirely done in user

Re: Memory usage of BIND process - threads?

2012-04-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2 > processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have > no threads (using T under top(1)). In 5.0 and 5.1 threads are entirely done in userland and won't show up separately i

Re: Memory usage of BIND process - threads?

2012-04-20 Thread Kostas Zorbadelos
Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2 processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have no threads (using T under top(1)). Is this part of the patches in the OpenBSD version of BIND? Regards, Kostas -- Kostas Zorbadelos twitter:@kzorb