On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:52:51PM -0500, Alan Corey wrote:
> It seems simple to me [...]
It seems simple because you haven't studied voting systems and their
requirements for privacy, security, integrity, reliability, etc.
You have also failed to consider that the privacy, security, integrity,
re
| Is this an OpenBSD mailing list?
Yes, it is. The simple fact is that some peple cannot get an idea on a
subject. Two examples are security and randomization.
Something inside them tells them "you didn't get it" or " you almost
got it" and they want to show this is not true. Hence the venting on
Apologies for speaking out of turn.
Is this an OpenBSD mailing list?
Vivek
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Joel Wirāmu Pauling
Sent: Tuesday 15 November 2016 20:46
To: gwes
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Why on earth would online voting be insecure?
On 15
On 15 November 2016 at 09:47, gwes wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 00:55, Joel WirÄmu Pauling wrote:
>
>> So yes, back to my original point. A Civic's blockchain, one that does not
>> rely on the integrity (or rather is resilient to) the system it runs on,
>> or
>> the security of the transmission media
On 11/15/2016 00:55, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
So yes, back to my original point. A Civic's blockchain, one that does not
rely on the integrity (or rather is resilient to) the system it runs on, or
the security of the transmission media ; as a platform for use in civic's -
needs to exist first.
So yes, back to my original point. A Civic's blockchain, one that does not
rely on the integrity (or rather is resilient to) the system it runs on, or
the security of the transmission media ; as a platform for use in civic's -
needs to exist first.
Block-chains are relatively new and we are still
On 11/14/2016 22:19, Alan Corey wrote:
OK, it's relevant to OpenBSD because I wouldn't consider anything else
safe enough to run on the servers. Not that I'm in a position to do
any of it. The servers could even be run from custom official live
CDs so they were harder to tamper with, with maybe
OK, it's relevant to OpenBSD because I wouldn't consider anything else
safe enough to run on the servers. Not that I'm in a position to do
any of it. The servers could even be run from custom official live
CDs so they were harder to tamper with, with maybe a RAM drive for
speed.
There seems to b
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Alan Corey wrote:
> This sounds like heel-dragging to me, or they're trying to do it under
> Windows or something:
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/05/17/more-than-30-states-offer-online-voting-but-experts-warn-it-isnt-secure/
>
> It seems
You need a civic blockchain or some-such that guarantee's data integrity
and agnosticism of the platform that anyone can verify.
The interface into / mechanics once you have a blockchain which you can
issue tokens from is the simple bit.
Not sure this is relevant for this list tho.
-Joel
On 14
[Off-topic; sorry. It's important to remind people of this issue, but I
won't follow up any further.]
This sort of security, no matter how well done, doesn't address one of
the very important but often forgotten features of voting in person at a
polling place: it makes it very difficult to buy
This sounds like heel-dragging to me, or they're trying to do it under
Windows or something:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/05/17/more-than-30-states-offer-online-voting-but-experts-warn-it-isnt-secure/
It seems simple to me, you use firewalls and only make the results
wri
12 matches
Mail list logo
