Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> tirsdag 11 Marts 2008 skrev Thomas Wiest:
>
>> sasha wrote:
>>
>>> Could you please view at this bug:
>>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368516
>>>
>>>
>> Unfortunately it's too late to get this bug fixed for 1.9. I've added it
>> to ou
You can install from Fedora 9 (development) rawhide.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Edson - gMail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a machine at work to install mono monodevelop, but, the os
> installed on this machine is Fedora 8. At
> http://www.go-mono.com/mono-downloads/download.html I ca
Hi:
recently i have lot of problem to get mono/monodevelop in my fedora 8, i
recomend you the following steps:
#FOLLOW THIS RECOMENDED LINK TO ADD REPOSITORIES, ETC:
http://cardix.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/post-instalacion-de-fedora-8/
#INSTALL RPMS IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER FROM PAQUAGES FROM
htt
Hi,
With respect to the comments to the previous patch I revised it. I have
added version macros to CPPFLAGS without removing existing settings and
exported CPPFLAGS for libgc.
I also added compile time ARCHITECTURE detection to winconfig.h in addition
to the enhancements in the previously p
tirsdag 11 Marts 2008 skrev Thomas Wiest:
> sasha wrote:
> > Could you please view at this bug:
> > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368516
> >
>
> Unfortunately it's too late to get this bug fixed for 1.9. I've added it
> to our list of bugs to look at for our next release.
Please
I have a machine at work to install mono monodevelop, but, the os
installed on this machine is Fedora 8. At
http://www.go-mono.com/mono-downloads/download.html I can find just
packages for RHEL 4 or the .bin file to install, but they don't assemble
perfectly. Fedora 8 installs just the basic. I
Yeah, sorry about that. I think they had the wrong preview number on
that page for a day or so before I fixed it.
Wade
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 21:01 -0600, Thomas Wiest wrote:
> D Bera wrote:
> >> We've just released Mono 1.9.0 Preview 4 today! Please help us out by
> >> giving it a try with
Dan,
On 11-Mar-08, at 9:04 AM, Daniel Morgan wrote:
> Have these changes been put into svn yet?
>
The changes have been in in SVN since the hack week. Whats missing is
the following:
WindowsPlatform (this is incomplete so neither me or Jonathan commited
it yet).
To get things running on t
2008/3/11 Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> I have installed mono 1.2.6 and monodevelop 0.19. I'm trying to compile
> olive project. I get following error
Mono 1.9 is required to build Olive now.
Cheeers,
Sandy
___
Mono-devel-li
Hi,
I have installed mono 1.2.6 and monodevelop 0.19. I'm trying to compile
olive project. I get following error
touch ../../class/lib/net_3_5//.stamp
MONO_PATH="../../class/lib/net_3_5:../../class/lib/net_3_0:$MONO_PATH" gmcs
/codepage:65001 -d:NET_1_1 -d:NET_2_0 -d:NET_3_5 -debug+ /noconfig -r
Have these changes been put into svn yet?
--- Jonathan Pobst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I pretty much just compiled trunk on Linux with
> --disable-gnomeplatform,
> and don't put an option for gtksourceview2, and it
> will just use the new
> managed source editor. Later I wrote a
> WindowsPl
Thank you very much for the help.
I attached a revised version of the patch.
Kornél
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] [Windows] Define version macros
forWindowsSDK
Kornél Pál w
12 matches
Mail list logo