I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which
IDE I should use?
Thanks,
Peter
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Antonello Provenzano-3 wrote:
>
> Atsushi,
> What I wanted to say was that doing a transition from VS.NEt to #D is
> a good idea, since they are "comparable"... :D
>
Our company is working third year exclusively with #D, and since
SharpDevelop 2.0 the experience is simply great!
It has debugg
Hi,
> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which
> IDE I should use?
Try sharpdevel (it's the one MonoDevelop is based on IIRC)
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
Thanks, Paul, I'll try SharpDevelop.
Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which
>> IDE I should use?
>>
>
> Try sharpdevel (it's the one MonoDevelop is based on IIRC)
>
> TTFN
>
> Paul
>
> --
Peter,
SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO)
comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need
(debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.).
Cheers.
Antonello
On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to start working with m
I strongly encourage you to not lie.
SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring.
Atsushi Eno
Antonello Provenzano wrote:
> Peter,
>
> SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO)
> comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need
> (debugger, code
Atsushi,
> I strongly encourage you to not lie.
What do you mean? :|
On 3/26/07, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I strongly encourage you to not lie.
>
> SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring.
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
> Antonello Provenzano wrote:
> > Peter,
> >
> > SharpDevelo
Oops, I apologize. I misunderstood "comparable" that you meant
SD is not usable.
Atsushi Eno
Antonello Provenzano wrote:
> Atsushi,
>
>> I strongly encourage you to not lie.
>
> What do you mean? :|
>
>
>
> On 3/26/07, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I strongly encourage you to not
Atsushi,
> Oops, I apologize. I misunderstood "comparable" that you meant
> SD is not usable.
No problems, but I meant the exact opposite: IMHO #D is one of the
best IDe for developing Mono and .NET code under Windows.
What I wanted to say was that doing a transition from VS.NEt to #D is
a good i
Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of
policy to attack people talking about SD?
You should check http://icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/Features.aspx for
more information.
Radek
> I strongly encourage you to not lie.
>
> SharpDevelop does support debugging and refac
Radek,
> Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of
> policy to attack people talking about SD?
There has been a *huge* misunderstanding: I was speaking of #D in a
good way, saying it is "comparable" to VS.NET for most of the features
needed by developers, while Atsushi
Nah, what I've originally thought was the quite opposite, as I wrote
that it *does* support debugging and refactoring.
Atsushi Eno
Radek Polak wrote:
> Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of
> policy to attack people talking about SD?
>
> You should check http://ic
Hi,
i misunderstood too :-). Sorry for my stupid answer. Have a nice day
Radek
> Radek,
>
>> Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of
>> policy to attack people talking about SD?
>
> There has been a *huge* misunderstanding: I was speaking of #D in a
> good way, saying
13 matches
Mail list logo
