Interesting idea, but not necessarily in the way you meant it. The things you list are applications that happen to run on Mono, but they aren't really integral to Mono as a platform or runtime environment. It's hard to see the overall benefit of such a loose collection of applications (unless the
Yes, that would be great. No such list exists at the moment. This
would at least allow interested parties to communicate amongst
themselves, exchange patches and the like while the project sorts itself
out.
+1.
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
We can host a Tao list if people need them.
___
Hi Chris,
Nothing has changed in SVN for months, so unless ODE updates are sitting
in a private branch somewhere, I'd say the work hasn't been done yet.
Your contribution would probably be welcome were there an avenue to do
so. At the risk of drawing criticism from the maintainer(s) for asking
o
[This should have gone to the list earlier today. Note to self: check reply
addresses before sending]
Ok Lab wrote:
>Upgrading to mono 1.1 on linux gets me much further through the build
>process but it still fails. I noted that it tries to build against the
>mono 1.0 framework and has no opti
