On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Thomas Keller > ...the question is if we really need these options for anything else than
>> commentary in the pot header...
>
> We don't really. I can do something about this later today.
Should be fixed in r
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
> Argh, I was now bitten by the same problem on a rather "ancient"
> openSUSE 10.3 which also comes only with gettext 0.16 and does not know
> of --package-name or --package-version either.
>
> Since 0.17 came out in November 2007 (a bit more th
Thomas Keller schrieb:
> William Uther schrieb:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I notice that the current head fails to build the documentation on
>> MacOS X if you're using the fink package manager for your dependencies.
>> The problem is that the fink package manager has an ancient version of
>> gettext (0.1
William Uther schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I notice that the current head fails to build the documentation on
> MacOS X if you're using the fink package manager for your dependencies.
> The problem is that the fink package manager has an ancient version of
> gettext (0.14) and its version of xgettext
Hi all,
I notice that the current head fails to build the documentation on
MacOS X if you're using the fink package manager for your
dependencies. The problem is that the fink package manager has an
ancient version of gettext (0.14) and its version of xgettext doesn't
handle the '--pac
