Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-13 Thread Dan Mosedale
John Marmion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Dan, > > I managed top sort out the MessageListener functionality > and get a simple implementation working. I used the > nsLDAPChannel code as a guide. Was this meant as an > example or to be used as is? Anyway, I have a couple > of further querie

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-13 Thread John Marmion
Hi Dan, I managed top sort out the MessageListener functionality and get a simple implementation working. I used the nsLDAPChannel code as a guide. Was this meant as an example or to be used as is? Anyway, I have a couple of further queries to ask you. I notice that on the return from the Si

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-06 Thread Dan Mosedale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Dan Mosedale wrote: > >... > > Name: MozillaAddrBook.pdf > > Type: APPLICATION/pdf > >MozillaAddrBook.pdf Encoding: BASE64 > > Description: MozillaAddrBook.pdf > >... >

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-05 Thread Csaba Borbola
Hi, here is the html version of the previous document and 3 gif files for the pictures. You have to put all the 4 files in the same directory to get it work properly. Csaba Dan Mosedale wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Dan Mosedale wrote: > > >... > > >

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Mosedale
John Marmion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I wanted to get back to you before the weekend to give you > my very early impressions of using the XPCOM LDAP Wrapper. We will > be very happy to use it. It looks like a solid bit of > engineering. Thanks! Glad it looks to meet your needs. We hop

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Mosedale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Dan Mosedale wrote: > >... > > Name: MozillaAddrBook.pdf > > Type: APPLICATION/pdf > >MozillaAddrBook.pdf Encoding: BASE64 > > Description: MozillaAddrBook.pdf > >... >

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-02 Thread John Marmion
Hi Dan, I wanted to get back to you before the weekend to give you my very early impressions of using the XPCOM LDAP Wrapper. We will be very happy to use it. It looks like a solid bit of engineering. I notice that it has Query only functionality and that it employs ayschronous access. We wil

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Mosedale
Michael Chui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dan Mosedale wrote: > > > > There is already an LDAP tracking bug - bug 36557. > > > > I'll try and add some comments to that and related bugs in upcoming > > days and weeks regarding what I and others at Netscape are working on > > and trying to achi

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-01 Thread Michael Chui
Dan Mosedale wrote: > There is already an LDAP tracking bug - bug 36557. I'll try and add some comments to that and related bugs in upcoming days and weeks regarding what I and others at Netscape are working on and trying to achieve...     Does this mean there are Netscape engineers assigned to w

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-02-01 Thread Matthew Thomas
Dan Mosedale wrote: >... > Name: MozillaAddrBook.pdf > Type: APPLICATION/pdf >MozillaAddrBook.pdf Encoding: BASE64 > Description: MozillaAddrBook.pdf >... Could an HTML version of this document b

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-01-31 Thread Dan Mosedale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Bucksch) writes: > Dan Mosedale wrote: > > > if there are plans > > to add LDAP access to the address book, we would rather know now. > > John, the best way to work at Mozilla is to post frequently to the > newsgroups and file or take over bugs in bugzilla for each task.

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-01-31 Thread Dan Mosedale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Mosedale) writes: > > [Forwarded with permission] > > > Absolutely; coordinating our work would be a fine thing. I'm in the > > process of transitioning to a new job right now where I will be > > working full-time on LDAP browser integration, so now is a great time > > fo

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-01-31 Thread Ben Bucksch
Dan Mosedale wrote: > Heh; actually the main point of my forwarding that was that I thought > folks would be interested in the attached PDF. Duh! I didn't even notice it. > I'll try and add some comments to that and related bugs in upcoming > days and weeks regarding what I and others at Netsca

latest LDAP datasource (was Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla])

2001-01-31 Thread Dan Mosedale
As requested by a few folks, here is the latest nsLDAPDataSource.js file. It is still not quite working, but getting there. Peter: this version has a few edits since the one I sent you earlier today (my time; I guess that'd be yesterday for you). Since jband has fixed 67258, I've removed debugg

Re: [Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-01-31 Thread Ben Bucksch
Dan Mosedale wrote: > if there are plans > to add LDAP access to the address book, we would rather know now. John, the best way to work at Mozilla is to post frequently to the newsgroups and file or take over bugs in bugzilla for each task. There is already an LDAP tracking bug - bug 36557. -

[Fwd: LDAP access in Mozilla]

2001-01-31 Thread Dan Mosedale
[Forwarded with permission] > Absolutely; coordinating our work would be a fine thing. I'm in the > process of transitioning to a new job right now where I will be > working full-time on LDAP browser integration, so now is a great time > for us to try and make sure that our work intersects cle