yatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Luke wrote:
[snip]
>>>2) How about a "clear urlbar" icon on the toolbar?
>>?!
>You need to try this out before it's usefullness becomes
>apparent. It's simply a small button which clears the urlbar, making it
>easier to type in an url because you don't
>have
Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gervase Markham wrote:
>>>what's the prize I have won? ;-)
>> From the original post:
>>"Asa won a holiday to someplace near Yosemite at the picnic today, but
>>the tight-fisted old so-and-so refuses to give it away, so the prize is
>>merely a free next-
Dave Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I personally have no interest in installing Flash or any other gimicky
>plug-in. I find it extremely annoying that, every time I visit a site
>which includes one of these pieces of junk, Mozilla prompts me to
>download and install the plug-in. I want a wa
MeTwo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ok, at least now I know where I stand :)
>But why is it possible in Outlook Express? Anything special about it?
Outlook Express and Hotmail are both owned by Microsoft; Hotmail has
a proprietary (and AFAIK undocumented) protocol which is only supported
by OE.
jeet shahani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
> A bug that is bothering me when using Mozilla is that I cannot simply
>login into hotmail.com. I end up
>using IE just to login and check emails. No, changing my email account
>is not an option. :-)
> Can anyone please explain i
Richard Kuryk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am a web developer and I really love the new mozilla but I have
>noticed when you click to view source it downloads the page from the
>server rather than the page you are looking at. Probably most times
>this is okay but much of the web today is dyn
JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Laurent Granger
>says...
>>http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mozilla.org&doctype=Inline
>Ooof. It's pretty amazing that Maozilla is able to render its own home page
>without crashing, as sensitive as it (and the Po
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>multipart/meowbot wrote:
[snip]
>>Plus, multipart/alternative
>>doesn't deliver on the hope that it would appease those who would have
>>mail and news remain plaintext-only media forever (it just makes
>>curmudgeons angrier about the increased size),
>ROTFL! Y
Rip Toren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok;
> This is getting interesting. Now, the question is whether the browser
>is the correct place to work this problem?
[snip]
>It seems to me it has just become more obscure. The real problem seems
>to be the server on port 25 accepting the mail for forw
Marc Leger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I want Microsoft everything. I want to call a .NET webservice and my dog
>brings me the paper.
So, why are you here?
--
Adam Fitzpatrick
10 matches
Mail list logo
