On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Chris Sawer wrote:
> The \version in the .ly file should match the version of LilyPond that you
> want us to compile with.
Thanks, then there's only one missing puzzle left. Say if I have a
piece with (hypothetically)
\version 2.19.3, but the machine rendering th
Abel Cheung wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Chris Sawer
> wrote:
>> The \version in the .ly file should match the version of LilyPond that
>> you want us to compile with.
>
> Thanks, then there's only one missing puzzle left. Say if I have a
> piece with (hypothetically)
> \version 2.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Alexander Jones wrote:
> As far as I know, adding \version 2.19.3 to the file means that any future
> versions would recognize the file as being written with v2.19.3 syntax,
> parsing it accordingly. 2.19.3 wouldn't need to be installed separately.
My concern here
I'd propose you add a comment to your pull-request stating this
concern.You can add a link to a publicly avail pdf showing your
typesetting as cross-reference, and even cite the bars at
issue.Javier Ruiz-Almajav...@ruiz-alma.com___
Mutopia-discuss mail
