> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 18:55:42 +1000
> From: Erik Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: most commonly used regex lib for awk/frep/mutt/sed?
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> >
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > Is this too ambitious a wish?
>
> unfortunately, yes.
Ricardo SIGNES is a man of vision, I think. If it is practical to link
in a preferred regex suite, as described in his post on this thread, to
allow the ERE-proficient amongs
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 08:22:36AM -0400, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
>
> echo >> ~/.muttrc set pcre_acknowledge=on # to avoid PCRE warnings on startup
Ok, so I don't know how to call echo, and s/=on/yes/
Still, you get the picture.
--
rjbs
msg30054/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Erik Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-01 07:48]:
> > While procmail seems to be out on a long plank in the
> > middle of a swamp, it would be cosmically empowering to be
> > able to move between mutt, vim, awk, and grep with
* Erik Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-01 07:48]:
> is there any enthusiasm for employing a "most commonly
> used" regex library, such that any improvements can feed
> back into all the tools using it?
>
> While procmail seems to be out on a long plank in the
> middle of a swamp, it woul
