begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:53:12AM +0100:
>
> and i wonder whether there is a
> way to make mutt's reply command
> use the filtered text for quoting..
Ok, you want them to vanish for viewing, and vanish for quoting.
Why is it that you don't use procmail to s
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:53:12AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 03:39]:
> > On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > [-- Attachment #2 --]
> > > [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --]
> > >
> > > that i
On Mar 28, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is filter-message seeing the message after the attachment color is applied?
s/filter-message/display-filter
must not mail before 9am.
msg26355/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mar 28, John Buttery [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/28 07:58]:
> >> well, I had tried to delete
> >> those lines with sed pattern
> >> /^\[-- .* --\]$/d
> >> but it did not work.
> >>
> >> however, using the
> >> following sed pattern
> >> makes them g
* Thomas Huemmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 08:55:45 +0100]:
>* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/28 07:58]:
>> well, I had tried to delete
>> those lines with sed pattern
>> /^\[-- .* --\]$/d
>> but it did not work.
>>
>> however, using the
>> following sed pattern
>> makes them go
* tim lupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 22:06:08 -0600]:
>* thus spaketh Sven Guckes (Mar 28 at 03:37AM):
>
>> but - is there a way I can just *hide*
>> the pgp sig *completely* from view?
>
>mutt reads mail--stripping pgp sigs is the job of procmail or the
>like <-- sorry, couldn't resist :P
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/28 07:58]:
> well, I had tried to delete
> those lines with sed pattern
> /^\[-- .* --\]$/d
> but it did not work.
>
> however, using the
> following sed pattern
> makes them go away:
> /-- .* --/d
>
> I'll have to find out why the
> first pattern did
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 03:39]:
> On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > [-- Attachment #2 --]
> > [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --]
> >
> > that is, mutts still shows the pgp sig (like an extra attachment).
> > is there
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus:
> If not, you could strip them with procmail.
Oh, so it's ok to strip sigs with procmail, but not headers? :P
--=20
Rob 'Feztaa'
* thus spaketh Sven Guckes (Mar 28 at 03:37AM):
> but - is there a way I can just *hide*
> the pgp sig *completely* from view?
mutt reads mail--stripping pgp sigs is the job of procmail or the
like <-- sorry, couldn't resist :P
--
timothy lupfer
http://sadlittleboy.com
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> [-- Attachment #2 --]
> [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --]
>
> [-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
>
> that is, mutts still shows the pgp sig (like an extra attachm
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:37:11AM +0100:
>
> but - is there a way I can just *hide*
> the pgp sig *completely* from view?
Do you still want to verify the sigs, or not?
If not, you could strip them with procmail.
msg26333/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP si
now, here's the situation:
when the current message has a pgp sig and "pgp_verify_sig" is set
the mutt will show an error message iwhich is something like this:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Mar 28 03:29:50 2002) --]
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is signed -
13 matches
Mail list logo
