Re: 3.23.32 replication problem

2001-01-23 Thread John Barton
I have also encountered this problem when upgrading master and slave from 3.23.31 to 32.23.32. The upgrade of the master went fine, and both servers remained in sync throughout the process. However, when I upgraded the slave and restarted, it gave the same error that it could not find first log. T

Re: 3.23.32 replication problem

2001-01-23 Thread Sasha Pachev
On Tuesday 23 January 2001 07:28, Jean-Luc Fontaine wrote: >On Tuesday 23 January 2001 15:13, you wrote: >> >Just tried a 3.23.32 slave (on Linux, all rpms from www.mysql.com) against >> > a >> >> 3.23.30 server: >> >010123 09:38:05 mysqld started >> >> /usr/sbin/mysqld: ready for connections >>

3.23.32 replication problem

2001-01-23 Thread Sasha Pachev
>Just tried a 3.23.32 slave (on Linux, all rpms from www.mysql.com) against a 3.23.30 server: >010123 09:38:05 mysqld started /usr/sbin/mysqld: ready for connections >010123 9:38:05 Slave: connected to master '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306', replication started in log 'jfontain-bin.008 ' at positi

3.23.32 replication problem

2001-01-23 Thread Jean-Luc Fontaine
Just tried a 3.23.32 slave (on Linux, all rpms from www.mysql.com) against a 3.23.30 server: 010123 09:38:05 mysqld started /usr/sbin/mysqld: ready for connections 010123 9:38:05 Slave: connected to master '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306', replication started in log 'jfontain-bin.008 ' at position