Let's try and limit the name calling to the playground, and stick to the
mailing list charter.
Unless either of you two has something topical to discuss, this discussion
should be taken to private email and not the mailing list.
Sameer
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma
> I've been called a lot of things, but moron isn't one of them.
Want to make a bet on it with your boss?
Moron.
Sal Sabella
Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> http://www.kkc.net/baptista/
>
> I strongly suggest you just quietly ignore Mr. Baptista. I can assure you
> that this is my last post on the subject no matter how he tries to bait me.
> It's the only technique that works with him.
Poor D'Arcy -
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, John M. Brown wrote:
> I guess the question is.
>
> At what point does one build redundancy into the network.
>
> I suspect its a balancing act between reducancy, survival (network)
> and costs vs revenues.
In 1982 AT&T was still a monopoly, could spend whatever it took and
Yet, it is reasonable that people expect x % of their traffic to
use IX's. If those IX"s are gone then they will need to find another
path, and may need to upgrade alternate paths.
I guess the question is.
At what point does one build redundancy into the network.
I suspect its a balancing ac
this is an abuse of anonymous addresses and an abuse on this list.
since the person being mocked didn't even reply to this thread, there
is certainly NO need for this twit to reply.
List Admin, please drop this person.
zero content here. even the spam thread floods have more content
than [E
On September 12, 2002 07:31 pm, Tony Hain wrote:
> The sad part is that absolutely clueless articles like this one get
> wider distribution than they deserve, and it takes even more travel and
> face time to refute the nonsense. In most cases it is hard to tell if
> the author is really as cluele
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> > Thanks to everyone who helped out.
> But you didn't actually read now did you?
> Oh well you are a reporter nobody can blame you for doing work ;)
> But to pull some things straight:
>
> " IPv6, a suite of protocols for the n
Hi, NANOGers.
I have updated my BGP monitoring to include ASN analysis. This includes
the count of unique ASNs, the count of ASNs that originate at least one
prefix, the average path length, the maximum path length, and the bogus
ASNs. You will find it all here:
http://www.cymru.com/BGP/index
The sad part is that absolutely clueless articles like this one get
wider distribution than they deserve, and it takes even more travel and
face time to refute the nonsense. In most cases it is hard to tell if
the author is really as clueless as the resulting article would lead you
to believe, or
Sal,
I've been called a lot of things, but moron isn't one of them. It's
been fun playing.
Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3
> I'm not a big fan of GE period; too many recalls. However you
> might want to take a look at Jennair
I had a bet with my boss that GE would bring good things to life.
Please don't tell me I lost.
Sal Sabella
Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
Sal,
I'm not a big fan of GE period; too many recalls. However you might
want to take a look at Jennair. Here's my favorite.
http://www.jennair.com/ja/products/prod_detail.jsp?model=WW30430P&cs=0&B
V_UseBVCookie=Yes
Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.b
>Thanks for the response. The 'Broadband' in Broadband Laboratories
>actually refers to the Microwave
That makes sense. I have a question you might be able to answer.
I've got some Cerent and Sycamore boxes, and I'm trying
to locate a GE Advantium line card. We're fixing to sell
Advantium w
At 02:28 PM 9/12/2002 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>"Christopher J. Wolff" wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing
> > analog cable television network.
>
>Yes Chris, it's called DOCSIS. I would think that a CIO of a company
>named "Broadband Labs" wo
Hi Sal,
Thanks for the response. The 'Broadband' in Broadband Laboratories
actually refers to the Microwave flavor of last-mile and long-haul data
transmission. As a general operating philosophy, we eschew wired
last-mile network solutions (DSL, Cable) as inefficient, costly to
capitalize, and
"Christopher J. Wolff" wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing
> analog cable television network.
Yes Chris, it's called DOCSIS. I would think that a CIO of a company
named "Broadband Labs" would have a lab in which to experiment with
cable.
> My current
Have you really?
>Because you have continued to post off-topic messages to the NA
>NOG list,
>we have removed your posting privileges for a period of six mon
>ths.
>
>Susan Harris, Ph.D.
>Merit Network/Univ. of Mich.
>
>
>On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Jane, lea
It is not quite clear to me what you have in mind - do you want to send
exclusively IP television over the cable system, or do you want to fit
IP into an existing system ?
Current cable systems have separate parts of the spectrum reserved for
analogue or digital television channels and the inb
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 03:04:35PM -0400, Deepak Jain mooed:
>
>
> You would need multicast speakers (routers, etc) along the cable route to
> effectively multiple your bandwidth at all. Since cable is already
> multicasting (1 stream to many/all) I don't think I see any advantage.
>
> Unless,
In article ,
Christopher J. Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing
>analog cable television network.
http://www.google.com/search?q=docsis
Mike.
You would need multicast speakers (routers, etc) along the cable route to
effectively multiple your bandwidth at all. Since cable is already
multicasting (1 stream to many/all) I don't think I see any advantage.
Unless, of course, you expect cable customers to be broadcasting to other
cable cus
"Christopher J. Wolff" wrote:
> My current thoughts on this are to digitize the satellite video into
> mpeg2 and deliver it over TCP/IP through the in-ground cable. This way,
> integrating the video and data portion are easy, however the resident
> would need to buy a mpeg2 set-top-box to split
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:24:15AM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
> The cable companies do this quite well; however, it's not
> immediately clear to me how I would multiplex the IP traffic and
> the existing video and deliver it to a home.
Well, the traditional solutions involve som
Nathan,
If your MPEG2 video were multicast streams, wouldn't that be a much more
effective utilization of bandwidth?
Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing
> analog cable television network. The cable companies do this quite
> well; however, it's not immediately clear to me how I would multiplex
> the IP traffic
Greetings,
Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing
analog cable television network. The cable companies do this quite
well; however, it's not immediately clear to me how I would multiplex
the IP traffic and the existing video and deliver it to a home.
My current
This is scarcely the first time that a "reporter" has taken quotes from
NANOG and spliced them together into a news story. Analysts do it too. I
guess one of the weaknesses of this kind of forum is that the kooks (Jim
Fleming) come off looking as credible as those who have a clue (like
Stephen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a bet with my boss that Booz Allen Hamilton will file for chapter 11 before
>Equinix.
You lose.
> Sal Sabella
>
> Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
Jane, leave the chapter 11 speculation to the analysts. I can understand how chapter
7 is reason for operational concern, but come on.
What are you trying to do, set a record for the most off-topic posts over the course
of a week? (Of course, Susan likes to play favorites, so it's not like
Hi all,
I just got word of this last night.
Here's the publication and the story for any who are interested:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/08/30/BU117189.DTL&type=business
I certainly hope this doesn't happen.
Jane
Joe Baptista wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who helped out.
But you didn't actually read now did you?
Oh well you are a reporter nobody can blame you for doing work ;)
But to pull some things straight:
" IPv6, a suite of protocols for the network layer,
uses IPv4 gateways to interconnect IPv6 nod
Thanks to everyone who helped out.
cheers
joe baptista
>http://www.circleid.com/articles/2533.asp
>
>Overcoming IPv6 Security Threat
>
>September 12, 2002 | By Joe Baptista
>
>Technology rags and industry pundits see IPv6 (Internet Protocol version
>6) as the future of networking, but Daniel
Cisco 2611's with serial cards are also a popular choice. For one thing,
they run SSH, and are quite reliable and inexpensive.
- Daniel Golding
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Bender, Andrew
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 8:
"Al Rowland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only drop in 'traffic' I've ever noticed was in my former life in
> the military. Retreat policy on base was that traffic pulled [cut]
i think i was lucky i never had a car while i was living on base :)
regarding the 'silence' yesterday - i was wo
Hi Dan,
I could recommend you the use views in bind.
This feature in bind you could answer according to the origen of the ask.
With a good dns cfg you could resolve a big part of your problems.
Regards,
Daniel
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 17:34, Dan Lockwood wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I have
36 matches
Mail list logo
