Douglas == Douglas Otis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BATV doesn't help you if the problem is SMTP transaction volume,
any more than a firewall will help you cope with a saturated
network link.
Douglas Your statement regarding BATV is not correct however. There
Douglas are two ways BATV
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Otis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew - Supernews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: SMTP store and forward requires DSN for integrity
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 17:37 +, Andrew - Supernews
On 12/11/05, Micheal Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If malware detection systems would not generate a DSN to the originator
upon detection in the first place, there would be no need to reduce
those transactions as there would be no transactions to reduce. The
That is a big if.
No shortage
I agree with nearly all of your analysis, but want to add
a few small points of my own.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 04:53:03AM -0600, Micheal Patterson wrote:
Can BATV correct this? Possibly.
After reading further and thinking about it: I believe the
answer isn't possibly, but almost certainly
folx,
is there *any* way to make this thread die now? it seems that all of
the available positions have been staked out and many of the obvious
insults and diatriabes have been slung. we are now moving into
tangential positions, diatribes and insults. that's usually a sign
that the
