forget it, the issue is related to issues with a transit provider.
*shrug*
-chris
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Christian Malo wrote:
>
> Seems like cogent has been having issues this morning. I'm seeing high
> latency all over the place.
>
>
> Anyone has any idea what's going on?
>
>
> -chris
>
>
Seems like cogent has been having issues this morning. I'm seeing high
latency all over the place.
Anyone has any idea what's going on?
-chris
FREE RICHARD
-chris
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Husan Sarris wrote:
>
> NANOG,
>
> It is with great sadness that I inform you that Richard Steenbergen,
> long-time NANOG contributor and colleague, has been censored by Dr.
> Harris this morning. Richard will be barred from posting to this list
> unti
since when nanog-l turned into gmailswaps.com ?
come on already.
-chris
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Steven S. wrote:
>
> And with that they're gone. Your welcome to everyone I got (I'm in the
> process of sending them out as we speak).
>
probably not as much as shittynetwireless.net
-chris
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bubba Parker wrote:
>
> Maybe because efnet sucks? :) *runs*
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:07:40AM -0400, Matthew McGehrin wrote:
> >
> > Why would you need to re-invent the wheel?
> >
> > There are multiple EFNET serve
I'm sure Susan will make sure to revoke his posting rights.
-chris
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:44:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Okay... Here is a new one for me. Got a call from my dad saying he left
> > his PC on last night conn
no need to email your resume ...
-chris
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Krichbaum, Eric wrote:
>
> They went to a loose configuration to get the Isat (most of our sat
> users) back to an operational state. The Isat vendor is now testing a
> tunneled version.
>
>
> Eric Krichbaum, Chief Engineer
> MCSE:
procket ? :)
-chris
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Tony Li wrote:
>
>
> Well, that's pretty impressive. Since you're not using Juniper or
> Cisco, whose
> gear are you using?
>
> Tony
>
>
> On May 25, 2004, at 12:58 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
> >
> > So you never run any production code that was comp
bill, mind to not use NANOG as your own yellow pages ?
-chris
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, william(at)elan.net wrote:
>
>
> If there is somebody from Cisco on this list who has been accessing
> completewhois port 43 whois service with thousands of consequitive queries
> for last few days (or possibly
It was down, came back up.
It's certainly not a networking problem so saying it's down from a couple
hosts doesn't matter.
that's it that's all, no need to tell everybody it was down for you.
-chris
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Forrest Houston wrote:
>
> Back for me now too. I was seeing the error
May I add that a lot of NANOG people actually use IRC for many reasons.
You would be suprised to learn how many of the people posting to NANOG
chat on a daily basis in a certain #nanog channel. Would you be pissed to
know that I'm an IRCer and I also own NANOG.NET ?
ohh and also, #nanog has memb
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
>
> Tony Tauber wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:36:27PM -0400, Derek Samford wrote:
> > > > Shane,
> > > > There is a practice on that (At least here.).
> > > >
I heard that UU.net is rolling Outlook at the core ...
-chris
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jeff Harper wrote:
>
> Anyone think this is related the Klez virus?
>
> Jeff
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:58 AM
> > To:
13 matches
Mail list logo
