On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:47:50AM -0500, Jon R. Kibler scribed:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/markey.data.deletion.bill.020806.pdf
to delete information about visitors, including e-mail addresses, if the
data is no longer required for a legitimate business purpose.
Original
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:19:28PM +, Paul Vixie scribed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jared Mauch) writes:
it will be interesting to see if this has acutal impact on
ASN allocation rates globally.
i don't think so. multihoming without bgp isn't as hard as qualifying for
PI space. i
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:18:35AM +0100, Paul Jakma scribed:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, David G. Andersen wrote:
If you can run Squid, you can multihome your web connections today.
It's a little bit awkward to configure, but then again, so is
Squid. People are welcome to poke at, fold, spindle
I sent a similar mail out a couple of years ago and greatly appreciate the
response I got. Time and entropy have done their dirty work, so we're looking
for a few (more) good hosts.
We've been running a moderate sized (30 node) overlay network and general
network research testbed for the last
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 07:14:32PM +0200, JP Velders scribed:
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:21:46 -0700
From: Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems
For example, how many ISPs use TCP MD5 to limit the possibility of a
BGP/TCP connection
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 01:35:36PM +0200, Niels Bakker scribed:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David G. Andersen) [Thu 12 Aug 2004, 02:55 CEST]:
Global impact is greatest when the resulting load changes are
concentrated in one place. The most clear example of that is changes
that impact the root
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:49:18PM +, Paul Vixie scribed:
what i meant by act globally, think locally in connection with That
MIT Paper is that the caching effects seen at mit are at best
representative of that part of mit's campus for that week, and that
Totally agreed. The paper was
Regarding both Paul's message below and Simon Walter's earlier message on
this topic...
Simon Walters scribed:
I'm slightly concerned that the authors think web traffic is the big
source of DNS, they may well be right (especially given one of the
authors is talking about his own network),
Anyone know what happened to L3 during the last hour? They
seem to have developed an appetite for dropping packets
in San Jose for customers on the Genuity portion of their
network, but I'm curious if anyone has a slightly more
detailed explanation about the failure.
The failure seems to have
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:34:05PM -0400, jeffrey.arnold quacked:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
:: OK, so was ANYONE on NANOG happy with
:: a) Verisign's site finder
:: b) How they launched it
::
Disregarding their implementation issues, the product is pretty good.
I've
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 02:38:18PM -0400, Todd Vierling quacked:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
: EBD That's why one uses a daemon with main loop including
: EBD something like:
: EBD
: EBDsuccess = 1 ;
: EBDfor ( i = checklist ; i-callback != NULL ; i++ )
:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:50:51AM -0700, Vadim Antonov quacked:
In fact, we do have an enormously useful and popular way of doing exactly
that - this is called search engines and bookmarks. What is needed is
an infrastructure for allocation of unique semantic-free end point
identifiers
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 10:40:30PM +, Christopher L. Morrow quacked:
what about ports that start as 'private' and are eventually ubiquitously
used on a public network? (Sean Donelan noted that 137-139 were
originally intended to be used in private networks... and they became
'public'
from eBay Safe Harbor [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 22:58:01 -0700
From: eBay Safe Harbor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was not received (KMM86277800V90276L0KM)
To: David G. Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
Reply-To: eBay Safe
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:02:14AM -0600, Irwin Lazar quacked:
As one person noted in response to Christian's speech. If there
is no addressing shortage, why do I have to pay $75 a month for a
DSL connection with a static IP address when a floating IP address
only costs me $40 per month?
I
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:48:29PM -0400, Temkin, David quacked:
Does anyone know of any free, cheap, or potentially rentable latency
generators? Ideally I'd like something that just sits between two ethernet
devices to induce layer 2/3 latency in traffic, but am open to any
options...
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:51:51PM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff quacked:
Hello,
I would like to know if any service providers have built their access
networks out using private IP space. It certainly would benefit the
global IP pool but it may adversely affect users with special
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 07:07:28PM -0400, Andy Dills quacked:
I've got a friend who puts all of his internal servers,
routers, and _customers_ on RFC1918 space and pipes them out
thrugh a PNAT. Fairly small ISP - maybe 15 megabits of bandwidth -
operating at the state local level.
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 08:13:08AM -0700, Peter Lothberg quacked:
I don't expect GPS to spin out of control soon..
So GPS tracks TAI and the difference is published (2 months after the
fact..)
But it's simple to build a 'jamer' that makes GPS reception not work
in a limited area, same
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:25:25PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum quacked:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Joe St Sauver wrote:
you will see that for bulk TCP flows, the median throughput is still only
2.3Mbps. 95th%-ile is only ~9Mbps. That's really not all that great,
throughput wise, IMHO.
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:29:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] quacked:
High speeds are not important. High speeds at a *reasonable* cost are
important. What you are describing is a high speed at an *unreasonable*
cost.
To paraphrase many a california sufer, dude, chill out.
The bleeding edge
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:09:51PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson quacked:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Production commercial networks need not apply, 'lest someone realize that
they blow away these speed records on a regular basis.
What kind of production environment
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:11:00PM -0600, Jack Bates quacked:
Should we outlaw a potentially beneficial practice due to its abuse by
criminals?
Okay. What happens if you make a mistake and overload one of my devices
costing my company money. I guarantee you, the law will look favorably
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:09:31AM -0500, William Allen Simpson quacked:
Anybody have a pointer to scripts to map IP to AS?
There are still 10K-20K hosts spewing M$SQL slammer/sapphire packets,
and I'd like to start blocking routing to those irresponsible AS's
that haven't blocked
I should have been a bit more specific. The hacked up traceroute-ng
queries the radb, not a whoisd. I've never had problems
being blocked when doing radb queries, but YMMV, of course. I also
suggest that people be nice and rate-limit their queries so that
others don't have to do it for them...
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:17:20AM -0500, Tim Griffin mooed:
hc wrote:
I am on Verizon-GNI via Qwest and Genuity and seeing the same problem as
well.
here's a plot showing the impact on BGP routing tables from seven ISPs
(plotted using route-views data):
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 06:15:33PM -0800, Randy Bush mooed:
Wow, for a minute I thought I was looking at one of our old
plots, except for the fact that the x-axis says January 2003
and not September 2001 :) :)
seeing that the etiology and effects of the two events were quite
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:49:01AM -0500, Eric Gauthier mooed:
Ok,
I'm not sure if this helps at all. Our campus has two primary connections -
the main Internet and something called Internet2. Internet2 has a routing
table of order 10,000 routes and includes most top-tier research
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:36:14PM -0800, Mike Lyon mooed:
The link wants you to log in with a New York Times login...
-Mike
You can always learn from other mailing lists.
username: cipherpunks3
password: cipherpunks
-Dave
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:25:27AM -0500, Deepak Jain mooed:
As long as the car _moves_ under its own power across the highway, its
essentially not the car manufacturers' (or the consumers') immediate
concern.
That's really not true. Before car companies sell cars, they
pass (lots of)
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:38:08PM +, Christopher L. Morrow mooed:
has something called Source Path Isolation Engine (SPIE). There
This would be cool to see a design/whitepaper for.. Kelly?
The long version of the SPIE paper is at:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:48:03PM -0500, Brad Laue mooed:
By way of quick review, such an attack is carried out by forging the
source address of the target host and sending large quantities of
packets toward a high-bandwidth middleman or several such.
One method that comes to mind that
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:11:14AM -0500, David G. Andersen mooed:
b) Ioannidis and Bellovin proposed a mechanism called Pushback
for automatically establishing router-based rate limits to
staunch packet flows during DoS attacks.
[NDSS 2002, Implementing Pushback
Rule number 1 with any ethernet: Check to make sure you have the duplex
and rate statically configured, and configured identically on both ends of
the connection.
I'd wager you've got half duplex set on one side, and full on the other...
-Dave
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:19:10PM -0500, Drew
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:07:18PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen mooed:
We're still working on the distributed attacks, but eventually we'll come
up with something just as effective. If it was as easy to scan for
networks who don't spoof filter as it is to scan for networks with open
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:48:53PM +0200, Jesper Skriver mooed:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:35:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For the last two days, between approximately 7pm to 2am Eastern
time, a spammer hijacked a piece of our address space, presumably
by announcing some size
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 03:04:35PM -0400, Deepak Jain mooed:
You would need multicast speakers (routers, etc) along the cable route to
effectively multiple your bandwidth at all. Since cable is already
multicasting (1 stream to many/all) I don't think I see any advantage.
Unless, of
In the last few days, it's been advertised, but often
withdrawn. Perhaps the timing of the announces and
withdrawls will help you:
MIT saw it advertised via 1 701 8001 4276:
http://bgp.lcs.mit.edu/bgpview.cgi?time=dayprefix=216.223.192.0%2F19rel=eqtable=updatesaction=list
PSG (Randy Bush's
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:07:10PM -0700, Jim Hickstein mooed:
--On Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:51 AM -0400 David G. Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At work, it's all steel studs and foil-backed wallboard, and the windows
(for a patch GPS antenna) are _way over there_. *sigh* I'd
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:57:39PM -0400, John Todd mooed:
Hmm... $2400 is still in the pricey range to be throwing out
bunches of these across a network in wide distribution. (Pardon me
[...]
One would think that a vendor could come up with a 1u rackmount box
with a GPS and
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:00:38PM -0700, Scott Granados mooed:
What are people using for looking glass software. Is it just some simple
perl code which grabs data from the router or is it more complex than
that?
It's just perl. I have a copy of it at
Technically, you can't sell them to someone else.
-Dave
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:37:34AM -0400, Ralph Doncaster mooed:
There's lots of old C's that aren't being announced any more. You might
be able to find one that someone can lend you to use.
Strangley a search for portable class C
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 06:18:00AM -0700, todd glassey mooed:
Oh and use something like a SNIFFER to generate the traffic. Most of what we
know of as commercial computer's cannot generate more than 70% to 80%
capacity on whatever network they are on because of driver overhead and OS
This is more w.r.t. the huge burst of announcements yesterday,
not a persistent increase in the routing table sizes, but..
We saw absolutely huge amounts of announcements from
1 3459 17676 (sometimes with padding)
For example, see:
I'm trying to get a better feel for the dynamics of some
maybe-necessary BGP routing traffic, and had a few questions:
Under what circumstances will BGP send an update (of any sort)
to a peer when there is an internal failure that does _not_
result in the complete isolation of a prefix?
For
45 matches
Mail list logo
