Not seeing any of the routes, or any routes from AS41961. UUNET, Sprint,
and AT&T connectivity.
On Thu, January 4, 2007 05:57, Sebastian Rusek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since November 2006 we announce our 3 new prefixes:
>
> 194.60.78.0/24
> 194.60.204.0/24
> 194.153.114.0/24
>
> from new AS41961.
>
I had a couple of requests outside the list to pass on any information I
found.
The puck.nether.net phone number is correct. To get to the NOC it is
option #3. Option #2 is for trouble/ticketing.
There's additional information given between each option, so it takes a
while to hear that one.
While following the thread, I did a bit of Googling, then browsing 3Com's
site:
http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/detail.jsp?tab=features&pathtype=purchase&sku=3CRFW200B
On-NIC firewall w/remote management.
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Chris Woodfield wrote:
:>Simple solution...build the on-NIC fir
Replying with responses to my own post:
The overwhelming response was TTC/Acterna T-Berd with a couple of Digitial
Lightwaves thrown in, plus a hit each for Anritsu and Sunset.
Thanks for all the information.
Rick
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Rick Ernst wrote:
:>
:>
:>I've searche
I've searched the archives and find some hits on DS-1 test gear, but I'm
looking for opinions/experience with DS-3 test gear.
We've started bringing up more DS-3 circuits, both directly to customers and
also for Frame/ATM/DSL aggregation. Telco used to do all provisioning and
testing for us, bu
This was brought to my attention by a friend. It looks like
ns1.domainmonger.com and ns2.domainmonger.com are doing wildcard A records for
all zones, including those that already exist.
If you go to their site and try to register a domain, it properly shows if the
domain exists or not.
I'm try
Have you tried ordering it as an "alarm circuit"?
Also, it seems like telcos are less willing to provide dry pair anymore.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Austad, Jay wrote:
:>
:>Does anyone know to go about getting Qwest or a CLEC to patch through a dry
:>pair between two buildings connected to the sam
We are sending out feelers for adding an additional DS-3, or possibly frac
OC-3. One of the responses came back with "we won't be competive with
because they don't have their own backbone.
Is there a cross-reference for provider vs network backbone, or is this just
something that we have to as
I'm looking for a beast that is roughly a combination of Cisco NBAR and
Foundry URL inspection.
NBAR worked pretty well for CodeRed, but I'd rather have a dedicated device
rather than overloading a router with non-routing functions. I haven't used
Foundry's URL inspection, but it looks reasonab
Packet loss within UUNET, apparently localized to the Portland (OR) area.
I've turned down our peer with them and things are looking much better.
Thanks for all the help/responses.
Rick
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Rick Ernst wrote:
:>
:>
:>Gah.. I hate these kind of vague problems.
:>
:>I have multiple users complaining about "the internet is slow"; specifically
:>to sites such as aol, cnn, amazon. Our support folks are also having trouble
:>getting to
Gah.. I hate these kind of vague problems.
I have multiple users complaining about "the internet is slow"; specifically
to sites such as aol, cnn, amazon. Our support folks are also having trouble
getting to postini's admin pages. Things are excruciatingly slow.
I don't see any indications on
Is there a way to globally protect all inbound interfaces on a router via ACL
(specifically hundreds of frame/sub-interfaces) without applying the same ACL
to each individual interface?
Is the "line vty" config only for telnet/ssh, etc. or is it the magic global
that I'm looking for?
I'd post t
I've been asked twice off-list; here's the implentation I found:
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, steve uurtamo wrote:
:>
:>> I'm curious if anyone could point me to a utility for AS-Tree mapping from a
:>> routing table output? I searched the archive a bi
Wow. First I've heard of this.
Repeat... "Wow" :)
I took our 3 feeds and munged that data, then started playing with "how is
so-n-so connected". Pretty/interesting, and possibly even useful.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, steve uurtamo wrote:
:>
:>> I'm curious if anyone could point me to a utilit
FreeBSD and DUMMYNET?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Temkin, David wrote:
:>Does anyone know of any free, cheap, or potentially rentable latency
:>generators? Ideally I'd like something that just sits between two ethernet
:>devices to induce layer 2/3 latency in traffic, but am open to any
:>options...
We were just allocated a /17 out of 69/8. With all off the recent traffic on
69/8 reachability problems, I asked ARIN if the allocation could come from a
different block.
Their answer was basically that 69/8 (only) is where they are allocating from
and that "from reading NANOG, it appears that
17 matches
Mail list logo