I have a customer that's trying to do something I've never seen before,
and I'm trying to help him set it up.
They have a 2811 set up with a VPN using a GRE tunnel. We have that up
and running to the other end ok. However, the customer wants to control
which RFC 1918 10.x spac
This is probably just regional, but here in SE PA, I've had a few
customers who send their outgoing mail through smtp.comcast.net getting
"internal queueing error".
Anybody find what it is or was and when/if it was fixed?
TIA,
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Jan
> 27 * * *
> > 28 * * *
> > 29 * * *
> and all the usual NOC numbers are either busy or fast-busy (!)
>
> It's probably not a total melt-down, as our voice PRIs there are all
> still OK.
>
> //jbaltz
> --
> jerry b. altzman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I cannot even call their toll-free help lines, as the figer cut apparently
is affecting that as well, according to their local NOC people, who cannot
chd any more light on this.
I suprisingly just found that I can connect to my colo servers there if I
first ssh to a server I have in germany. Ho
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Rick Kunkel wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:53:56PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > ...
> > > Drew the attention of a friend at AOL to this and got a reply quoted
> > > below - this was apparently an issue at A
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Update: I replaced the batteries today, and indeed, several of the old
> > ones (mostly in the first pack) were split and some had popped a couple of
> > their "sealed" tops.
> >
> > I left for several hours and came bac
pletely different animal from the 5000, though.
> I <3 the Symmetra.
>
> Oh yes, one more point... best to check the 5000's battery packs for
> heat and bulging, as some of the packs may be about to vent the Hot
> Sauce, and cleaning that up is always "Fun". Aloha mai
everything down...everything came back up on its own except a customer's
colo server, which has a dead power supply and one of my servers, which
had a dead drive in its RAID 1 (the other was ok).
I looked at the UPS menus...status, etc and everything looked 100%, with
"BAD BATTS 0", 12 h
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Todd Vierling wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, David Hubbard wrote:
>
> > How about serve back bogus NTP data to non-BIX customer
> > prefixes? Maybe if people's computers start setting
> > themselves to the year 2004 D-Link will do something. :-)
>
> Perhaps return back a time
Questions:
If one gets PI space from ARIN for their network, then moves the servers
to a rack at a data center (still using the space efficiently), will most
colocation providers announce this space for them, or would most providers
require them to take allocated space from them?
Is it a reason
After taking IP space from upstreams for years, I am on the verge of
requesting PI space from ARIN, but after reviewing their guidelines, I
have a couple of questions:
1) I meet the Multihoming requirement, which means I can get a block as
small as a /22, which is about right for my needs. Are
ls faster than the speed of light"
>
> Steve
>
> >
> > Perhaps they are referring to being able to vary the speed while it is
> > below the speed of light. That is, slowing it down to 1/10th the speed of
> > light, and then speeding it up to 1/5th the speed of light.
>
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Geoff White wrote:
> 2) What is the "preferred or correct" way for a relatively small outfit
> (a small search engine) to implement Multihoming? Especially when most
> of the machines are a VLS cluster so we are not talking about a large
> address space here. It seems the o
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> >> One additional thing that I think wasnt mentioned in the article -
> >> Make sure your MXs (inbound servers) are separate from your outbound
> >> machines, and that the MX servers dont relay email for your dynamic IP
> >> netblock. Some other tro
tblock. Some other trojans do stuff like getting the ppp domain name
> / rDNS name of the assigned IP etc and then "nslookup -q=mx
> domain.com", then set itself up so that all its payloads get delivered
> out of the domain's MX servers
Easier said than done, especially if y
over the past couple of days, at least two of our servers have been
inundated with rather amateurish attempts to login as various priviledged
users. We're talking at least hundreds of attempts, mostly from 62.104.92
and 62.104.82. I whois shows the /16 (which I finally null routed the
whole thi
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Peter Galbavy wrote:
> Alexei Roudnev wrote:
> > Of course, not - he is not from USA (more likely), the end.
> > Why people believe, that this acts means ANYTHING? In Internet, they
> > (acts) means NOTHING.
>
> Unless they live in a country that has a "secret" treaty with th
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Brian Bruns wrote:
> Anyone happen to know of a contact for Comcast's mail server administrators?
> I need to discuss an issue with them about their mail servers mailbombing my
> systems from a joe job.
Good luck...the last time I had to contact their email admins, it took tw
I don't know if this is a related move or not, but I just received an
email from Verisign that they are selling NetSol. A snippet:
Dear Valued Network Solutions(R) Customer,
Today VeriSign, Inc. announced that it has entered into a definitive
agreement to sell Network Solutions to a new entity
I would call it dishonest. An analogy might be the curator for the Louvre
walking right up to the Mona Lisa in broad daylight, taking it, selling it
for personal gain, then, when questioned by incredulous onlookers, calmly
stating that it is his property to sell.
Bold, yes, honest?
On Wed, 8
In these days of corporate malfeasance scandal coverage, you'd think that
Verisign's tactics would have whetted the appetite of some bright
investigative reporter for one of the major publications.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> I have gotten a reasoned response from the tec
Actually, as awkward as those rubber hoods are, what I like about them is
that when you're pulling a disconnected patch cable through a rat's nest
of wires, they prevent the plastic tab from being bent backward.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, John Palmer wrote:
>
> Thats to prevent it from being disconne
Without a question: PS/2 style keyboard and mouse connectors. Impossible
to tell from each other, or the right way up without eyeballs directly on
them. A real PITA when trying to reach behind a desk or rack. The
console port is a close second, though...
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, David Barak
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Avleen Vig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 03:50:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A posting to full-disclosure quotes Theo as saying HP and Cisco are affected,
> > and I don't see any reason that Juniper would *NOT* be, given the common code
> > base of the OpenSSH
Lovely...still not on the mirrors yet, either...
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Jeff Wasilko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:58:13PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > I hope you mean OpenSSH 3.7p1 ?
>
> No, there was a 2nd release today:
>
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portabl
I hope you mean OpenSSH 3.7p1 ?
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Alex Lambert wrote:
>
> 3.7.1 was just released.
>
> Two patches for similar issues in a very short timeframe. Who do they
> think they are -- Microsoft?
>
>
>
>
> apl
>
> Original Message
> Subject: OpenSSH Security Adviso
the volume of SoBig virii hitting our mail server had gotten so big that I
had to have a cron job delete the quarantine every hour. We were
averaging about 400 of them per hour until around midnight last night,
where the volume went to and remains about 1/10th of that. Did this thing
expire (in
l POP3 boxes and send their own
> SMTP!
...and I can think of alot of servers that will BL those customers. DUL
blacklists are very commonly used. However "legitimate" these MS Exchange
servers are, they'd better get a static IP if they want to avoid problems
with many recipients.
now!
There are dangerous virus in the Internet now!
More than 500.000 already infected!
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A quick heads up, if anybody hasn't heard:
>
> At 1900GMT today, ET phones home, and picks up the next payload of
> instructions. Nobody knows (yet)
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You *do* have to admit it's an unusual combination of skills to:
>
> a) have enough clue to get subscribed to NANOG-post
> *AND*
> b) not be able to identify Windows Messenger spam
I dunno about that...I know when I first saw the Messenger spam
Yeah:
7 sl-gw29-nyc-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.13.16) 8.728 ms 8.674 ms
8 sl-ft-10-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.171.90) 12.338 ms 11.911 ms
9 P13-0.NYKCR2.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.241.30) 37.556 ms
10 P2-0.NYKBB5.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.241.230) 12.385 ms
11 81.52.
Philly has not been affected by this (yet), nor have I heard anything
about Boston.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Adam Debus wrote:
>
> At the moment the power outage encompasses:
>
> New York City
> Boston
> Philadelphia
> Detroit
> Toronto
> Ottowa
>
> and various and sundry smaller cities.
>
> Check
Actually, Mayor Blumberg just told CNN that the smoke being seen at the
ConEd plant is normal for this situation. It is also being reported that
this whole thing started in Ottawa, or an overload of the Niagra-Mowhak
power grid.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, N. Richard Solis wrote:
>
> I just got off t
>From CNN:
NEW YORK (CNN) -- A major power outage simultaneously struck several large
cities in the United States and Canada late Thursday afternoon.
Cities affected include New York; Boston, Massachusetts; Cleveland, Ohio;
Detroit, Michigan; Toronto, Ontario; and Ottawa, Ontario. The power out
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jack Bates wrote:
> John Neiberger wrote:
> >
> > Hmm...I didn't even know XP had a built-in firewall. Any bets on how
> > long it is before other companies with software firewall products bring
> > suit against Microsoft for bundling a firewall in the OS?
> > --
>
> No clue
no longer going to router /30 ptp
> subnets unless the customer specifically
> asks for it?
>
> Could that be why 10.x.y.z is showing up here?
>
> Sprint??? you out there?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Haesu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, J
This question might be more suitable for inet-access, but it's down, so
I'm resending here:
Silly question:
If you have a customer who is doing their own primary DNS, but you are
doing their secondary DNS (on 2 of your name servers) for them, is it
better practice on your 2nd DNS server to xfer
I just received 2 copies of this email from AOL's Postmaster, and it looks
genuine. We filter via SpamAssassin, but do not bounce spam or virii, but
divert them to separate folders.
The only strange activity I've seen lately is spammers getting past SA by
sending spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] via t
It's been like this all day:
The GeekTools Whois Proxy has encountered an error:
Unable to connect to whois.crsnic.net.
I've also had a couple of reports of weird DNS issues from other parts of
the 'net, although it's fine here...
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and
n. Please have your ISP/ASP contact AOL to resolve the issue at
> 550 703.265.4670.
>
> Trouble was, the people at 703.265.4670 can't help you. They just take
> your name, number, and some other basic info, and open a ticket that the
> postmaster group will "get to
All the person probing can do (regardless of their
> > intent) is say "Gee, I guess there aren't any vulnerabilities with this
> > network."
>
> When I hooked up my first server on the internet back in 1993, I was kind
> of shocked that some far away stranger wa
Our link to FastNet (formerly Netaxs) went down a while ago, and their
phone lines are all busy. I can get to fast.net's website, but none of
the netaxs servers, including NewsRead.com.
They are at a somewhat low elevation, so I'm wondering if they're dealing
with a flooding situation. Our cir
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Stephen Stuart wrote:
>
> > http://www.rackears.com/
>
> Damn, I'm in the wrong business. From the above-mentioned site:
>
> Cisco Cat. 2924M/2912M (2U) style kit$40.00
Think that's high? Check out Cisco's price, and yo
>From down here (the low end of the transit market), it looks like the
bottom of the transit market is already past. Sprint just raised their
prices by 8% for T1 and T3s, much more for DS0s. ATT raised their prices
for ATM and FR service, but that's really loop only (they say it "includes
port
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> And your suggestion has technical deficiencies as well. I have a leased
> line between Toronto and Ottawa, so I want to announce my Ottawa IPs to my
> Toronto transit provider as well as an Ottawa transit provider. And the
> reverse for the Toronto
This is really old news...actually, I seem to recall that they would only
accept /19 or shorter prefixes from former Class A & B space...I pressed
Sprint for a /21 from the swamp (instead of the former Class A space /21
they initially assigned) because of Verio's policy, in fact. They must
have
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> Of the remaining 9638, there are 523 unique X-Mailer
> references. I disqualified 24 for being quoted, or random
> X-Mailer discussion on NANOG. (X-Mailer discussion seems
> to be the ONLY thread that hasn't repeated itself in the
> last month
;t anyone see the irony here? Fighting abuse with abuse is somewhat
> counter-productive. SPAM prevents people from reading their email by a)
> filling up mail server queues b) filling up user mailboxes (and/or quotas)
> c) increased message count causes more time to be spent hitting delete
When you're dealing with what some people refer to as "tier 1 providers"
(I'll just say really big networks), this can be counter-productive. From
what I've seen the following providers have been notoriously unresponsive
to spam complaints (apologies if any of this is dated):
UUnet (Worldcom)
By now, I think it's widely accepted that it really isn't
"oversubscription" or "overselling" until congestion starts becoming an
issue. Up until then it's "statistical multiplexing".
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Brian wrote:
>
> Got to think most
On Sat, 25 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone else unable to reach AOL this morning via Sprint's network? I can
> get there through C&W or UUNet, but not via Sprint.
No problem here (at Sat May 25 10:29:18 EDT 2002):
traceroute to 8.internet.aol.com (205.188.76.13), 30 hops max, 40 by
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
>
> > RD> I often like to know if a particular web server is running Unix or
> > RD> Winblows. A port scanner is a useful tool in making that determination.
> >
> > [allan@ns1 phpdig]$ telnet www.istop.com 80
> > Trying 216.187.106.194...
> > Connec
52 matches
Mail list logo
