On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Arjan Hulsebos wrote:
> The Netherlands were hit as well. We saw a massive flood of queries for
> lockup.zonelabs.com, too. It performed a nice DoS on our client name
> servers :-(
>
> You'd think that an unresponsive nameserver would be flagged dead, and such
> informatio
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:31:32AM -0700, Duane Wessels wrote:
> In my simulations with 100% packet loss, DNS caches running BIND8,
> dnscache, W2000, and W2003 all amplified the user's query rates.
> Only BIND9 attenuated.
pdns_recursor also throttles queries, see http://doc.powerdns.com/x2025.
> You'd think that an unresponsive nameserver would be flagged dead, and such
> information be cached. Does anyone know whether that's actually done in Bind
> 8.3.4? Or perhaps not by default?
This certainly does not happen when all authoritative nameservers
are unresponsive. See http://www.nano
Title: RE: Above.net problems ??
> Is there any relationship between this "europeanwide"
> above.net failure and the huge amount of
> DNS requests to lockup.zonelabs.com which failed that every
> ISP (at least in France) seem to
> have encountered last night ?
&
In a message written on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:39:33PM +0100, Jerome Fleury wrote:
> Is there any relationship between this "europeanwide" above.net failure and the huge
> amount of
> DNS requests to lockup.zonelabs.com which failed that every ISP (at least in France)
> seem to
> have encountere
Hi there.
Is there any relationship between this "europeanwide" above.net failure and the huge
amount of
DNS requests to lockup.zonelabs.com which failed that every ISP (at least in France)
seem to
have encountered last night ?
The zonelabs.com zone is hosted on Above.net NS servers.
--On mer
In a message written on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:35:16AM +0100, Laurent Frigault wrote:
> The sessions reset again 35 minutes ago. Missing prefixes are back and
> above.net network seems reachable again.
We did restore full service overnight last night (well, probably early
in the morning for those
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:29:32PM +0100, Laurent Frigault wrote:
> > anyone having trouble with above.net at the moment ?
>
> Yes. The problem seems related to the TAT14 failure. Since, around 16h30
> (GMT +0100) our bgp sessions with AS 6461 reset and now they received
> only 82305 prefix.
The
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:08:29PM -0500, hostmaster wrote:
> anyone having trouble with above.net at the moment ?
Yes. The problem seems related to the TAT14 failure. Since, around 16h30
(GMT +0100) our bgp sessions with AS 6461 reset and now they received
only 82305 prefix.
Regards,
--
Lauren
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, hostmaster wrote:
> anyone having trouble with above.net at the moment ?
I'm sure somebody is. I have a problem with the way they filter portions
of the internet (which I'm just assuming has not been resolved internally
yet). Perhaps you're asking about their outage in/t
In a message written on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:08:29PM -0500, hostmaster wrote:
> anyone having trouble with above.net at the moment ?
AboveNet is having issues due to the second cable cut on TAT-14.
In addition I have just received some information that appears to
be some "helpful" ISP's leaking
> anyone having trouble with above.net at the moment ?
>
> cheers
> -Bert
It is unreachable from various european networks for the
last 5-6 hours .
Best regards ,
--
=
Dimitris Zilaskos
Department of
anyone having trouble with above.net at the moment ?
cheers
-Bert
13 matches
Mail list logo
