On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:56:07AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Correct. One of the few solutions you can do is setup connectivity (VPN
> or so) of your own between them.
Oh excellent idea. Pushing traffic twice through the upstream pipes? I'm
sure the upstream ISPs will be very happy about such
Ok, I promise this is my last reply to the list about this... This
has gone too far into theoretical and not operational content, and
probably belongs on an IPv6 policy list, so I'll hush. :) I'll
follow up with anyone privately who wants to continue the discussion
though.
On Dec 22,
> ---Original Message---
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter)
> Sent: 22 Dec '05 03:55
>
>
> The RIRs have not made any decisions yet about offering
> geotop addresses, but 7/8
> However I'm much more concerned that "big" providers (anyone who can
> qualify for a /32) need to make nearly zero changes to their way of
> doing things, but Mom&Pop's regional ISP or Chuck's Web Hosting and
> Bait Shop are going to be losing out big when it comes to IPv6.
> Which is prefera
Kevin Day wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
>> Kevin Day wrote:
[..]
> The disincentives for a small-mid sized network to moving to IPv6 are pretty
> big right
> now, which means very few of us are going to do it willingly. (Remember,
> the little guys are who are go
On Dec 21, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:Kevin Day wrote:[..]I agree with your point that currently your IPv4-solution can't beapplied to IPv6 but..(see the helpful and nice thingy part at the end ;)Thanks. I also just want to add that I'm not expecting to be able to do every single thing w
Woops. This is the URL I meant to preface the comment with:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&oi=defmore&defl=en&q=define:Interframe+gap
-M<
>
> Thus spake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:00PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > Last time I checked, Ethernet is still CSMA/CD.
Ok, sure, half-duplex. People using auto-neg.
> Only if you're running half-duplex, which is generally an
> error condition in
> modern ne
Thus spake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:00PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Really? Where are the limits of BGP? Can you show me any numbers?
You'd be the first. I'm not aware of any protocol inherent scaling
brickwalls like with other protocols where certain timing constraint
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:11:17PM -0500, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
> > Correct. And there you have minimum frame spacing requirements (IFG)
> > and (e.g. with 10Base2 networks) minimum distance between stations
> > attached to the bus to allow CSMA/CD work correctly.
>
> Interframe gap has no depe
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:43:58PM -0600,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Really? Where are the limits of BGP? Can you show me any numbers?
> > > You'd be the first. I'm not aware of any protocol inherent scaling
> > > brickwalls like with other protocols where certain timing
> constraints
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:43:58PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Really? Where are the limits of BGP? Can you show me any numbers?
> > You'd be the first. I'm not aware of any protocol inherent scaling
> > brickwalls like with other protocols where certain timing constraints
> > place limits
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:00PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 08:34:06PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > The issue with announcing say a /48 is though that networks which filter
> > will filter it out and will only reach you over the aggregate. Of course
> > that is t
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 08:34:06PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> The issue with announcing say a /48 is though that networks which filter
> will filter it out and will only reach you over the aggregate. Of course
> that is their choice, just like yours is to try to announce the /48's in
> IPv6, or
Kevin Day wrote:
[..]
I agree with your point that currently your IPv4-solution can't be
applied to IPv6 but..(see the helpful and nice thingy part at the end ;)
> 1) We've got separate POPs in different cities, with no dedicated
> connectivity between them. They act as entirely independent netwo
15 matches
Mail list logo
