On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:50:01PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly
> > as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more
> > experience and skills to back it up. I think the results are
>
> Altho sometime I have to
ng it and can't HTTP to a web server
J
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:50 AM
>To: McBurnett, Jim
>Cc: chuck goolsbee; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93
day, March 11, 2003 8:43 AM
To: chuck goolsbee; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24?
Is anyone from Alter.net lurking?
Just for grins I went to the DIGEX looking glass and I could not ping it
from MAE-Central, PAIX , MAE-East and also from AT&
Brilliant. Why did not you try "telnet 80"?
Just because random packets spewed by traceroute are dropped on the floor
does not mean that the site is dead.
As I stated to many in off-list mail last night, we were unable to
get to that IP on any port. It was not just traceroute. My original
em
Stephen J. Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> posts. Perhaps clueful folk should sneak off and form nanog-clueful
> mailing list ;)
S the'll all want one.
Peter
> Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly
> as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more
> experience and skills to back it up. I think the results are
Altho sometime I have to wonder especially with some of the recent posts.
Perhaps clueful folk should
>
> Is anyone from Alter.net lurking?
> Just for grins I went to the DIGEX looking glass and I could not ping it
> from MAE-Central, PAIX , MAE-East and also from AT&T Cerf router
> below are some of the traces.. Always dies on Alter... I wonder.
> Alter?
Brilliant. Why did
ok)
And away to the bit bucket...
>-Original Message-
>From: chuck goolsbee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:14 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24?
>
>
>
>Forgive the intrusion...
>
>W
DJR> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:01:51 +0700
DJR> From: Dr. Jeffrey Race
DJR> [C:\]ping 208.196.93.204
DJR> [C:\]host 208.196.93.204
1. You read the NANOG FAQ, yes? Please explain your post.
2. Did TCP attempts to various well-known ports stay in SYN_SENT,
switch to CONNECTED, or return
> >Emails to UUnet's NOC are unaswered and the guy I talked to on the
> >phone @ UU wouldn't open a ticket because I'm not a customer (but his
> >traces were dying in the same place as mine:
> >
> >207.ATM6-0.GW11.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.29.185))
> >
> >Can anybody out there hit that IP (208.196.
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:14:07 -0800, chuck goolsbee wrote:
>Forgive the intrusion...
Forgiven
>We have a customer who uses some merchant services off of
>208.196.93.204, which seems to be unreachable via any location I try.
>Emails to UUnet's NOC are unaswered and the guy I talked to on the
>pho
OK... so I'm an idiot... end of a long day, apologies. The /8 was a
jump to a bonehead conclusion on my part. The /24 & IP in question
remains unreachable on any port from here, but I did get enough
offlist clueXfours to follow up offlist and soothe our client for
the time being.
Thanks folks
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, chuck goolsbee wrote:
>
> Forgive the intrusion...
>
> We have a customer who uses some merchant services off of
> 208.196.93.204, which seems to be unreachable via any location I try.
> Emails to UUnet's NOC are unaswered and the guy I talked to on the
> phone @ UU wouldn't
Forgive the intrusion...
We have a customer who uses some merchant services off of
208.196.93.204, which seems to be unreachable via any location I try.
Emails to UUnet's NOC are unaswered and the guy I talked to on the
phone @ UU wouldn't open a ticket because I'm not a customer (but his
trac
14 matches
Mail list logo
