On Jan 19, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Pete Templin wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Is it a reasonable alternative to establish a BGP connection with
the
provider over ethernet?
It is technical feasible, but I don't think 'reasonable'. Stub
ASes are pollution on the 'Net.
OK, let's try a simil
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Is it a reasonable alternative to establish a BGP connection with the
provider over ethernet?
It is technical feasible, but I don't think 'reasonable'. Stub ASes
are pollution on the 'Net.
OK, let's try a similar but different scenario. Customer has ISP A,
add
On Jan 18, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Tony Li wrote:
IMHO, wasting any resource is unfortunate, but the cost of
additional forwarding table entries
far outstrips the cost of additional DRAM. Thus, adding an
additional prefix does merit
a significant shout from others, but the stub AS should only be
i On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If one gets PI space from ARIN for their network, then moves the servers
> to a rack at a data center (still using the space efficiently), will most
> colocation providers announce this space for them, or would most providers
>
Routing slots aren't the only resource you're consuming. In
general, many of the prefixes coming out of a given AS have common
attributes, e.g. path, MEDs, etc. Those attributes are stored only
once (at least in the BGP implementation I know) even if they're
used by hundreds of prefixes
Thus spake "Chris Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
It adds zero useful data to the global table, but increases RAM, CPU,
etc. on every router looking at the global table.
How much difference is there between one AS (the colo provider)
a
--On January 18, 2006 5:21:35 PM -0500 "Patrick W. Gilmore"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, obviously, the path entry is longer. :)
Yeah and if they (somehow) obtain an ASN for this non-multihoming venture
then that completely wastes an ASN for no good. And as we all know there
aren't
On Jan 18, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
It adds zero useful data to the global table, but increases RAM, CPU,
etc. on every router looking at the global table.
How much difference is there between one AS (the colo provide
On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Chris Ranch wrote:
In the past under these circumstances, if the customer still
insists on
BGP after I strongly recommeded just a static DFG, I'd peer with the
customer with a private AS (64512-65535). Then they usually ask me to
annouce a DFG to them. Sometimes
Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It adds zero useful data to the global table, but increases RAM, CPU,
> etc. on every router looking at the global table.
How much difference is there between one AS (the colo provider)
announcing a prefix and another AS (the cust
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:10 PM, Pat wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
> >>> Is it a reasonable alternative to establish a BGP connection with
> >>> the provider over ethernet?
> >>
> >> It is technical feasible, but I don't think 'reasonable'.
> Stub ASes
> >>
On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
Is it a reasonable alternative to establish a BGP connection with
the
provider over ethernet?
It is technical feasible, but I don't think 'reasonable'. Stub
ASes are pollution on the 'Net.
We've done this as well. Whats wrong with letting
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
If one gets PI space from ARIN for their network, then moves the servers
to a rack at a data center (still using the space efficiently), will most
colocation providers announce this space for them, or would most providers
require them to take alloc
On Jan 18, 2006, at 2:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one gets PI space from ARIN for their network, then moves the
servers
to a rack at a data center (still using the space efficiently),
will most
colocation providers announce this space for them, or would most
providers
require them
Questions:
If one gets PI space from ARIN for their network, then moves the servers
to a rack at a data center (still using the space efficiently), will most
colocation providers announce this space for them, or would most providers
require them to take allocated space from them?
Is it a reason
15 matches
Mail list logo