Re: the value of reverse address lookups?

2004-04-01 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:21:43 EST, "Douglas F. Calvert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > justification for this practice? In my opinion it does not appear to > increase the validity of the connection. But I may be missing something It tells you that the connection is coming from a netblock managed by

Re: the value of reverse address lookups?

2004-03-31 Thread Andrew - Supernews
> "Adrian" == Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adrian> if you reverse resolve, then some registry somewhere (ARIN, Adrian> RIPE, APNIC, etc) recognises that network as having 'valid' Adrian> contact details and has assigned someone reverse authority. Adrian> It stops some IP bloc

Re: the value of reverse address lookups?

2004-03-31 Thread Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
Douglas F. Calvert wrote: On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 19:59, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Douglas F. Calvert wrote: I am interested in finding out what the motivation is for requiring valid reverse address lookups before connecting to a daemon. I have heard a number of different expla

Re: the value of reverse address lookups?

2004-03-31 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004, Douglas F. Calvert wrote: > > Hello, > I am interested in finding out what the motivation is for requiring > valid reverse address lookups before connecting to a daemon. I have > heard a number of different explanations, the majority of the responses > point to history/trad

Re: the value of reverse address lookups?

2004-03-31 Thread Joe Maimon
Douglas F. Calvert wrote: What more is known about the mail sender or ssh client just because the reverse address lookup goes through? You have a clue as to who their ISP thinks they are...for starters. Also its easier on the eyes in the logfiles. Anyone care to give their thoughts on the

Re: the value of reverse address lookups?

2004-03-31 Thread Douglas F. Calvert
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 19:59, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Douglas F. Calvert wrote: > > > I am interested in finding out what the motivation is for requiring > > valid reverse address lookups before connecting to a daemon. I have > > heard a number of different explanations, t

Re: the value of reverse address lookups?

2004-03-31 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Douglas F. Calvert wrote: > I am interested in finding out what the motivation is for requiring > valid reverse address lookups before connecting to a daemon. I have > heard a number of different explanations, the majority of the responses > point to history/tradition and tc

the value of reverse address lookups?

2004-03-31 Thread Douglas F. Calvert
Hello, I am interested in finding out what the motivation is for requiring valid reverse address lookups before connecting to a daemon. I have heard a number of different explanations, the majority of the responses point to history/tradition and tcpwrappers. Is there a commonly accepted justifica