On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Erik Amundson wrote:
I was having issues reaching any of the roots, and any of the TLDs for
.com and .net. I tested them directly, and had no luck.
It's more likely they were having trouble reaching you. My guess is that
much of your return traffic normally comes to yo
Erik Amundson wrote:
> I was having issues reaching any of the roots, and any of the TLDs for
> .com and .net. I tested them directly, and had no luck.
how did you test? please cut and paste. "it did not work," is pretty
useless.
randy
I was having issues reaching any of the roots, and any of the TLDs for
.com and .net. I tested them directly, and had no luck.
I was merely looking to see if anything was broken elsewhere in the
world to see if it was just my network so I could diagnose things a bit
better.
XO's problem eventua
Buhrmaster, Gary wrote:
> By answering, we are enablers.
it is not possible to answer as there was no actual answerable question,
so this is not an issue
> By not answering, we are unhelpful elitists.
i have no problem with whatever fools wish to call me. i care for the
opinions of the wise.
By answering, we are enablers.
By not answering, we are unhelpful elitists.
Rock, meet hard place.
> we will probably never know. folk who say "the internet broke" seem
> unable to actually waste their time giving us actual technical
> information. this seems matched to a willingness to waste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Tune in tomorrow for updates". Most likely, it's a TLD server or
> three that he's unable to reach, not the actual roots themselves.
we will probably never know. folk who say "the internet broke" seem
unable to actually waste their time giving us actual technical
inf
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:52:34 -, =?utf-8?B?Q2hyaXN0aWFuIEt1aHR6?= said:
> To Vladis' point, how do you know that you couldn't reach the roots vs the
> roots not being able to reach you?
In addition to which, his nameservers probably wouldn't *need* to reach the
actual roots unless they'd manag
To Vladis' point, how do you know that you couldn't reach the roots vs the
roots not being able to reach you?
--
Sent from my BlackBerry.
-Original Message-
From: "Erik Amundson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:39:37
Cc:
Subject: RE: DNS issues?
I also have UUNET
Erik Amundson wrote:
> I also have UUNET and Qwest routes working fine, but even on those, I
> couldn't reach the roots for quite a while.
actual technical description of symptoms would be helpful. e.g. could
not ping/trace to some list of root server addresses?
randy
Our representative told us they had a massive fiber cut in the Dallas metro
area that affected a number of connections.
Jason
On 7/20/07, W. Kevin Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, this morning Broadwing/L3 had yet another failure, and it took them
hours to figure out what the hell was w
I also have UUNET and Qwest routes working fine, but even on those, I couldn't
reach the roots for quite a while.
Erik Amundson
IT Infrastructure Manager
Open Access Technology Int'l, Inc.
Phone (763) 201-2005
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: This email and any attachment(s)
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:25:41 CDT, Erik Amundson said:
> We just lost DNS totally for a while and just got it back...XO
> communications also lost almost all Internet routes at the same time...
Cause (losing all routes) -> effect (can't reach stuff other side of the routes,
including DNS servers)?
We just lost DNS totally for a while and just got it back...XO
communications also lost almost all Internet routes at the same time...
Anyone else noticing weirdness?
Erik Amundson
Yeah, this morning Broadwing/L3 had yet another failure, and it took them
hours to figure out what the hell was wrong.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Francis
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 11:39 AM
To: W. Kevin Hunt
Cc: nanog@nanog.or
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 7/20/07, Scott Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
panther reports issues between L3 and e.g. Savvis, GBLX, PCCW and
others in the LAX/SFO area (we're having performance issues with some
of their CDN nodes in those areas right now). Possibly more widespread
than just California ...
master ti
panther reports issues between L3 and e.g. Savvis, GBLX, PCCW and
others in the LAX/SFO area (we're having performance issues with some
of their CDN nodes in those areas right now). Possibly more widespread
than just California ...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
encrypted em
17 matches
Mail list logo
