> Perhaps a monthly update would be useful?
we are running it approximately monthly from servers on three continents
to see how things change over time and how locations differ.
oh, and we do comparative traceroutes do diagnose *where* the filter is.
just pinging out there, as patrick suggested,
> Switching topics only slightly: Nick, do you have any data on what parts
> of the 'Net you can and cannot reach? Perhaps take a dump of
> route-views and ping some IPs in each ASN? Shouldn't be hard to script,
> and might yield useful data - both to you and the rest of us.
tee hee. been there
On 6/08/2008, at 4:18 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Switching topics only slightly: Nick, do you have any data on what
parts of the 'Net you can and cannot reach? Perhaps take a dump of
route-views and ping some IPs in each ASN? Shouldn't be hard to
script, and might yield useful data - b
On Aug 5, 2008, at 3:26 PM, Tim Sanderson wrote:
Ya sure, like any of us would admit to 50% clue-ness.
With all the posts here about bogons I would really be surprised
that any nanog readers didn't know about keeping bogons updated.
I'd be shocked it there were no people who read NANOG and
Nick:
Out of curiosity and considering your position in the NOC, does anyone else
on your staff read this list regularly?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Nick Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 12:44 PM
To: 'Jeroen Massar'
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Ou
Ya sure, like any of us would admit to 50% clue-ness.
With all the posts here about bogons I would really be surprised that any nanog
readers didn't know about keeping bogons updated.
--
Tim Sanderson, network administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
Thanks for the input.
Currently, we are receiving 173.16.x.x /19 and /18, with plans to get
additional IPs within the same range.
ASN 6478 or 7018 - Through AT&T
You can test access to this network by ping this gateway: 173.16.28.1
Whois information:
173.16.28.1
Record Type:IP Add
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:48:51 -0400
"Jay R. Ashworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On an unrelated topic: I may have discovered the
> "nanog@nanog.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED]" problem's source:
>
> I think it's the list.
>
> I sent this message manually, typing in nanog@nanog.org by hand as the
> To add
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:16:53 CDT, Nick Downey said:
> This is an heads-up from the Mediacom Network Operations Center about an
> issue we are seeing. We
> were recently given an IP scope from ARIN (American Registry for Internet
> Numbers) that still
> exists on older Bogon lists many
Will do. Thanks for the input. First time posting to this board.
When I get everything together, should I just resend the entire email or
just the information being requested?
Nick Downey
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 1
Nick Downey wrote:
This is an heads-up from the Mediacom Network Operations Center about an
issue we are seeing. We
were recently given an IP scope from ARIN (American Registry for Internet
Numbers) that still
[..]
Please fix your mailer as it seems to be broken with respect to
This is an heads-up from the Mediacom Network Operations Center about an
issue we are seeing. We
were recently given an IP scope from ARIN (American Registry for Internet
Numbers) that still
exists on older Bogon lists many web providers are currently using.
A Bogon prefix is a ro
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 01:16:19AM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> Randy Cassingham at This Is True is complaining in his newsletter that
> he has something like 15K undeliverables to Yahoo email addresses,
> because, as he understands it, some of those people clicked Yahoo's
> 'This is Spam' butto
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:34:29PM -0700, Wayne E. Bouchard wrote:
> Hoping for a company which will put ethics above profit is like
> looking for an honest politician. They're extremely rare.
And, like Wiltel nd Mindspring, they tend to get bought out and ruined.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashwor
"Jay R. Ashworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How much *is* Big8 a day these days, though, a gig? I have a 10MBs
> hose...
If trends have continued since last I looked at it, very manageable
after you take out the binaries. Insignificant if you could figure
out a way to get rid of the flames
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2008-2 "IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal" which would allow the
>> transfer of the right to use an IP block.
>
> you may find it interesting to compare this to apnic's proposal
>
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/discussions/prop-050-v003.txt
>
>
On Aug 5, 2008, at 5:22 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
Story is here:
http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/Switzerland%3A_EFF_Software_Helps_Track_ISP_Bandwidth_Throttling
The tool is called... Switzerland.
Yes, the first time I read about it, I was well into the article
before I realized that they
were
* Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-01 19:06]:
> On 2008-07-28, Joe Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have yet to look into *BSD based solutions, but hear very good things
> >> about firewall performance. I don't know about BGP/OSPF/MPLS etc support
> >> on FreeBSD but am going
Gadi Evron schrieb:
Story is here:
http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/Switzerland%3A_EFF_Software_Helps_Track_ISP_Bandwidth_Throttling
The tool is called... Switzerland.
For the Swiss it's kinda strange ... and, the initial version was
released on Aug 1st, which is in fact the Swiss national day
Story is here:
http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/Switzerland%3A_EFF_Software_Helps_Track_ISP_Bandwidth_Throttling
The tool is called... Switzerland.
Gadi.
20 matches
Mail list logo