On Saturday 21 March 2009 06:38:55 pm br...@yoafrica.com
wrote:
> Slighty related...
>
> Can people please post their recommended reverse dns
> naming conventions for a small ISP with growth and
> scalability in mind. I already have one drawn up, but I
> would like to contrast and compare :D
As
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Heather Schiller wrote:
I don't think old vs new really matters.. pardon me for sticking w/ ARIN in
this example.. I can follow their fee structure easiest - and doesn't have
the old vs new: (https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html)
ARIN charges $100/yr for ASN's ..
The recommendations in this draft proposal have worked for me:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-msullivan-dnsop-generic-naming-schemes-00.txt
Frank
-Original Message-
From: br...@yoafrica.com [mailto:br...@yoafrica.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 5:39 AM
To: John Levine
Cc: nanog@nanog
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 08:44:23AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> perhaps there is a lesson here. move on to 4-byte asns.
>
> randy
er... 'parm me sir, but aren't -all- ASNs 4 bytes?
i mean, for lo these many years we cheated and only
used the first two bytes... but the
* Randy Bush:
> the real path is to move forward, increase income, and grow.
Sure. I was enlightened when someone posted to a RIPE mailing list,
"we are heading towards a future where address space is scarce" (my
words, not his). But the exact opposite is true.
>> It takes me about 3-5 hours of work to track down and get an old
>> unused ASN to be deallocated. How about updating the 2010 charging
>> model so that LIRs that return ASNs are compensated?
>
> I don't think this is a good way of using RIR funds. Why should the
> old guys receive even more s
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:00 AM, wrote:
> the 20th or 21st century answer?
> if you really don't care about the actual node, then you should map
the
> numbers to topologically significant names - after all, the reverse
map
> follows topology, not some goofball - layer 9 - ego tr
* Hank Nussbacher:
> Older LIRs have more allocations which compensates for the time
> factor of the algorithm. Older allocations need almost no human
> handling by the RIR vs a new LIR of a year which has a oodles of
> tickets that need human intervention.
And how much of that is the result of
the 20th or 21st century answer?
if you really don't care about the actual node, then you should map the
numbers to topologically significant names - after all, the reverse map
follows topology, not some goofball - layer 9 - ego trip thing.
or - the more modern approach is to let the node (
nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
hi,
I want to ask some folks out there that maintain reverse DNS queries
of their respective IP blocks. I want to know if there is a need for
me to contact my upstream provider. I am in charge of 2 /24's under
LACNIC. I've already registered my DNS servers on LACN
i am getting one volume of the list thats vol 14.i sure bet i am missing
some vol's. can you give me a hand on this anyone
--
regards
DAVID
Slighty related...
Can people please post their recommended reverse dns naming conventions for a
small ISP with growth and scalability in mind.
I already have one drawn up, but I would like to contrast and compare :D
Thanks
On 21 Mar 2009 10:32:30 -, John Levine wrote:
>> I want to ask s
> I want to ask some folks out there that maintain reverse DNS queries
>of their respective IP blocks. I want to know if there is a need for
>me to contact my upstream provider. I am in charge of 2 /24's under
>LACNIC. I've already registered my DNS servers on LACNIC. but for some
>weird reason it'
13 matches
Mail list logo
