On 10/17/10 8:24 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> That's why 3M registered mmm.com back in 1988.
and not just because minnestoaminingandmanufacturing.com is hard to type...
they've since officially change the name of the company to 3m...
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>
>
>
> On
On 18 October 2010 06:53, Jonas Björklund wrote:
>
> I have worked for one of the biggest poker networks and we used UltraDNS.
> The company was first operated from Sweden and later Austria.
>
> /Jonas
>
I would tend to agree... I have also used UltraDNS in the past for other
companies, however
We're using Afilias now, we had nothing short of a horrendous
experience dealing with Neustar / UltraDNS and their uninformed, blood
hungry sales team.
Best regards, Jeff
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jonas Björklund wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Ken Gilmour wrote:
>
>> Hello any weekend
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Ken Gilmour wrote:
Hello any weekend workers :)
We are looking at urgently deploying an outsourced DNS provider for a
critical domain which is currently unavailable but are having some
difficulty. I've tried contacting UltraDNS who only allow customers from US
/ Canada to
Hi,
The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation
of two /8 IPv4 blocks to APNIC in October 2010: 36/8 and 42/8. You
can find the IANA IPv4 registry at:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-spac
That's why 3M registered mmm.com back in 1988.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <20101018024021.gc8...@vacation.karoshi.com.>,
> bmann...@vacation.kar
> oshi.com writes:
>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 09:16:04PM -
In message <20101018024021.gc8...@vacation.karoshi.com.>, bmann...@vacation.kar
oshi.com writes:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 09:16:04PM -0500, James Hess wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Day Domes wrote:
> > > I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data
> > >
On Oct 17, 2010, at 7:16 PM, James Hess wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Day Domes wrote:
>> I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data
>> network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
>> any issues with this?
>
> The domain-name star
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 09:16:04PM -0500, James Hess wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Day Domes wrote:
> > I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data
> > network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
> > any issues with this?
>
> The do
> From: Warren Kumari
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:07:53 -0400
>
> On Oct 16, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> >> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:56:28 +0100
> >> From: Randy Bush
> >>
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
> Drafts are drafts
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Day Domes wrote:
> I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data
> network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
> any issues with this?
The domain-name starts with a digit, which is not really recommended, RFC 103
On Oct 16, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:56:28 +0100
>> From: Randy Bush
>>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
Drafts are drafts, and nothing more, aren't they?
>>
>> must be some blowhard i have plonked
>>
On 16/10/10 09:09 -0700, Rodney Joffe wrote:
I'm not sure about a documentary, but a group of us are working on identifying all the
different independent archives that have records from "the early years" with
the idea of creating a Smithsonian/national archive collection at some point. We'll
p
On Oct 16, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:40:41 +1030
>>> From: Mark Smith
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:31:22 +0100
>>> Randy Bush wrote:
>>>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iet
On Oct 16, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> You give a /64 to the end users (home/soho), and /48 to multi homed
> organization (or bigger orgs that use more than one network internally) and
> get a /32 if you are an ISP.
>
Please DON'T do that. End users (home/soho) should get at least
15 matches
Mail list logo
