Just a heads up to those attending NANOG in Atlanta.
Delta has already cancelled 500 flights for wednesday, and will likely be
canceling more.
http://www.delta.com/content/www/en_US/traveling-with-us/alerts-and-advisories/Southeast-Winter-Weather.html
You may want to check your reservations on
Or assuming your using an Ethernet of some sort as your upstream connections
you could grab something like a CCR from mikrotik for < $1k and sleep easy
knowing you're only using 6% of it's capacity.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 11/02/2014, at 3:52 pm, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
>
>> On 02/10/2014 0
On 02/10/2014 06:05 PM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> Are you suggesting getting the default gateway from both providers or
> getting the full table from one and using the default as a backup on the
> other (7206)?
Whatever suits you best. Test and see. I'd just receive the full table
anyway but filte
Are you suggesting getting the default gateway from both providers or
getting the full table from one and using the default as a backup on the
other (7206)?
Thanks,
On 2/10/2014 1:27 PM, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
On 02/10/2014 08:05 AM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
The ACL is a recent addition and w
Cisco once implemented and released this feature to use the second core of the
NPE-G1, most notably to manage the BRAS & en/decapsulations tasks for
LAC/LNS/PTA (PPPoE, L2TP...), effectively offering such 1.6 factor.
It was called MPF, and was released in special 12.3-YM IOS (in 2004/2005 I
gues
I was going to put my notes from today's
talk up at
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Past_Events
but discovered the site seems to have
gone read-only, and my login doesn't
work anymore. If people know what
happened to the logins for that site,
I'd be happy to add notes for today's
talks to the p
The NANOG60 Talk:
https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/monday.general.olschanowsky.routeviews.33.pdf
BGPmon Homepage
http://bgpmon.netsec.colostate.edu/
BGPmon Mailing List
http://www.netsec.colostate.edu/mailman/listinfo/bgpmon
BGPmon v7.3.3 Download
http://bgpmon.netsec.colostate.edu/index
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
Answers on and off list are appreciated.
At 700-800 megabit/s aggregated througput (in+out), you're very clsoe to
the max performance envelope of the G1. If you're going down this route,
be prepared to purchase new hardware at short notice in case
Nevermind, someone already jumped in and helped me. Thanks though for the
email.
Joe Jenkins
909.636.2097
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> On 2/10/14 9:08 AM, Joseph Jenkins wrote:
>> I am trying to get the routing objects database. However I am getting back
>> failures fo
On Monday, February 10, 2014 07:58:16 PM Nick Hilliard
wrote:
> in fact, the npe-g1 uses a BCM1250 which is a dual CPU
> unit but vanilla IOS is not able to use the second CPU
> for packet forwarding. Unsubstantiated rumour claimed
> that modular IOS (QNX kernel) could push about 1.6x the
> thro
On Monday, February 10, 2014 06:08:42 PM Nicolas Chabbey
wrote:
> I do remember we were able to forward around ~700Mbps of
> 1500 bytes traffic with old IOS images and no ACLs.
The trick is some of those additional features are better
optimized in more modern IOS releases (SRE, 15S). Quagmire.
On 10/02/2014 19:44, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> You mean IOS XR? Which was never released for software based routers,
> right? as it QNX in core.
no, I meant modular IOS, not XR. This was an attempt to run a non
bare-metal IOS. The kernel was based on qnx (http://goo.gl/9RSwHn), and
cisco released
On Monday, February 10, 2014 05:43:04 PM Vlade Ristevski
wrote:
> We're still on the 12.4 train. I do use an ACL with less
> than 100 entries which handle BCP38 and block a few bad
> actors and private IPs on the Internet. I will be moving
> the BCP38 ACL closer to the hosts before the upgrade so
Dear fellow networkers,
Through this tutorial-styled email I'd like to introduce the concept,
usage and implementation of "selective blackholing" through the BGP
protocol to the community. This email contains some python code, example
router configurations references to RIPE Atlas data to demonstr
On Monday, February 10, 2014 05:40:04 PM Alain Hebert wrote:
> Also the entire platform is rate for 1.8Gbs
> aggregated which mean depending on which interface you
> have, and which bus they are connected to, 900Mbps might
> be its limit.
I've done 900Mbps on an NPE-G2 with 95% CPU utilizatio
On Monday, February 10, 2014 05:17:09 PM Vlade Ristevski
wrote:
> This is the interface that connects to our provider. As
> you can see its almost all download traffic. Our ASR1002
> handles it without a sweat but I'm a little skeptical of
> whether the 7206 will hold up.
An NPE-G2 has a better
On 10.02.2014 21:58, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Unsubstantiated
> rumour claimed that modular IOS (QNX kernel) could push about 1.6x the
> throughput of vanilla IOS, as it was smp capable. Pity it was never released.
You mean IOS XR? Which was never released for software based routers,
right? as it Q
On 2/10/14 9:08 AM, Joseph Jenkins wrote:
> I am trying to get the routing objects database. However I am getting back
> failures for the messages that I send in. I am wondering is it possible to
> get route objects created for the two /24s that I was given from my carriers
> allocations? If
Someone asked me for the link...
http://routeviews-mirror.cert.org/
John Kemp
h...@routeviews.org
On 02/10/2014 08:05 AM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> The ACL is a recent addition and we can probably do away with it. I
> didn't notice a significant increase in CPU or drops since adding it.
> But we usually peak at about 200Mbps on this link. The full routing
> table is a must since we're dual homed
On 10/02/2014 15:30, Remco Bressers wrote:
> This depends on multiple variables. The 7200 is a single-CPU platform
> where CPU can go sky-high when using features like ACL's, QoS, IPv6 and
> you name it.. Also, changing from IOS 12.4 to 15 increased our CPU usage
> with another 10%+. Stick to the b
600Mb is going to be really pushing it. I doubt it will be able to handle that
kind of throughput.
Even with G2 I would think you would be pushing it.
-Original Message-
From: Remco Bressers [mailto:re...@signet.nl]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 9:56 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re
On 2/10/14, 7:57 AM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> Thanks for the link. When I looked at it, the PPS and bandwidth didn't
> really match what I see on my network so I'm curious to see what people
> are actually seeing. It looks like their test is done using very small
> packets (64K). Our traffic is mos
I am trying to get the routing objects database. However I am getting back
failures for the messages that I send in. I am wondering is it possible to get
route objects created for the two /24s that I was given from my carriers
allocations? If so what is the process to update the route objects
On 2/10/14, 7:43 AM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> We're still on the 12.4 train. I do use an ACL with less than 100
> entries which handle BCP38 and block a few bad actors and private IPs on
> the Internet. I will be moving the BCP38 ACL closer to the hosts before
> the upgrade so the ACL will be a bit
On 02/10/2014 04:30 PM, Remco Bressers wrote:
On 02/10/2014 04:17 PM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
We are looking to double the bandwidth on one of our circuits from 300Mbps to
600Mbps. We currently use a Cisco 7206VXR with an NPE-G1 card. These seem like
very popular routers so I'm hoping a few
peo
The ACL is a recent addition and we can probably do away with it. I
didn't notice a significant increase in CPU or drops since adding it.
But we usually peak at about 200Mbps on this link. The full routing
table is a must since we're dual homed.
On 2/10/2014 10:55 AM, Remco Bressers wrote:
On
Thanks for the link. When I looked at it, the PPS and bandwidth didn't
really match what I see on my network so I'm curious to see what people
are actually seeing. It looks like their test is done using very small
packets (64K). Our traffic is mostly web with a lot of Video (netflix ,
Hulu, yo
On 02/10/2014 04:43 PM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> We're still on the 12.4 train. I do use an ACL with less than 100 entries
> which handle BCP38 and block a few bad actors and private IPs on the
> Internet. I will be moving the BCP38 ACL closer to the
> hosts before the upgrade so the ACL will be
Both the inside and outside interfaces are on the same NPE-G1 card.
Thanks,
On 2/10/2014 10:40 AM, Alain Hebert wrote:
I have one but I never ran that much BW thru mine.
But the CPU usage is what will kill you.
Also the entire platform is rate for 1.8Gbs aggregated which mean
On 2/10/14, 7:17 AM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> We are looking to double the bandwidth on one of our circuits from
> 300Mbps to 600Mbps. We currently use a Cisco 7206VXR with an NPE-G1
> card. These seem like very popular routers so I'm hoping a few people on
> this list have them deployed. If you or
We're still on the 12.4 train. I do use an ACL with less than 100
entries which handle BCP38 and block a few bad actors and private IPs on
the Internet. I will be moving the BCP38 ACL closer to the hosts before
the upgrade so the ACL will be a bit shorter in the future. We won't be
doing any QO
I have one but I never ran that much BW thru mine.
But the CPU usage is what will kill you.
Also the entire platform is rate for 1.8Gbs aggregated which mean
depending on which interface you have, and which bus they are connected
to, 900Mbps might be its limit.
-
Alain Hebert
On 02/10/2014 04:17 PM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
> We are looking to double the bandwidth on one of our circuits from 300Mbps to
> 600Mbps. We currently use a Cisco 7206VXR with an NPE-G1 card. These seem
> like very popular routers so I'm hoping a few
> people on this list have them deployed. If y
We are looking to double the bandwidth on one of our circuits from
300Mbps to 600Mbps. We currently use a Cisco 7206VXR with an NPE-G1
card. These seem like very popular routers so I'm hoping a few people on
this list have them deployed. If you or a customer have these deployed,
how much bandwi
NANOG 60 Attendees -
Tomorrow morning there will be a Public Policy Consultation regarding
a sizable number of potential changes to address policy at ARIN.
Please find attached the list of policy proposals to be discussed; the
session begins at 9:30 AM and all attendees are we
I have had my best luck with getting google to correct geo-loc issues by
sending it in as a business end user instead of as an ISP.
If you have a user who is being affected directly by the incorrect geo-loc data
(My store is showing in the wrong country), Google takes that much more
seriously t
Hi Jonathan,
I have been submitting this issue to google with that same reporting location
issue page for last 4months. But it's still redirecting me to the different
page.. :(
Praveen Unnikrishnan
Network Engineer
PMGC Technology Group Ltd
T: 020 3542 6401
M: 07827921390
F: 087 1813 1467
E:
Hi everyone,
In the spirit of keeping each of the NOG communities in touch with
activities going on in each other's regions, the MENOG Program Committee
is hoping that some of you would be interesting in joining the Middle
East operations community for their 14th meeting in Dubai at the end of
Mar
I've had similar trouble.
Google thought we were in Israel, even months after filling in the form on the
page Jonathan linked to, on several occasions. This was years after being
allocated the address block by RIPE.
We eventually got it sorted dead quick by implementing "Self-published IP
Geolo
40 matches
Mail list logo
