On 9/30/16 12:42 PM, Pedro wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have some idea to put switch before bgp router in order to terminate
> isp 10G uplinks on switch, not router. Main reason is that could be some
> kind of 1st level of defence against ddos, second reason, less
> important, save cost of router
On 30 Sep 2016, at 1:34 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
>
> On 9/30/16 1:22 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>> Note that you can't sell the block as an "owned asset" and have ARIN
>> recognize the change. ARIN does not recognize ownership of IP address
>> blocks, they only recognize
On 30 Sep 2016, at 1:42 PM, Jim Mercer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:22:19PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
>> 1. Buyer gets approved by ARIN for a specified transfer in the amount
>> to be purchased. Signs RSA.
>> 2. Legacy registrant (seller) signs the LRSA, proves
On 30 Sep 2016, at 1:47 PM, Enno Rey wrote:
> ...
> Note also there's voices recommending not to sign an RSA for legacy space (in
> certain situations, at least), see
> http://ipv4marketgroup.com/dont-sign-an-rsa-during-your-82-ipv4-transfer/.
Probably best to talk to a variety
On 30 Sep 2016, at 12:49 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
>
> I'm trying to find a place on ARIN's website where this is addressed, but
> coming up short. I'm not the seller or buyer in this, but basically someone
> has a legacy block allocated by Postel and wants to sell the
On 9/26/16 9:37 AM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
On Mon 2016-Sep-26 12:25:58 -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
I gather the usual customer response to this is "if you don't want our
$50K/mo, I'm sure we can find another ISP who does."
I myself am talking about the latter and included
On 10/01/2016 06:39 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
You *can* do BCP38 egress filtering on your network, but that filter
would *be in control of the Bad Guys* whom we're trying to kill off.
I don't see how you arrive at this conclusion. For an aggregating
router, the Bad Guys(tm) don't get
* Jay R. Ashworth:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Florian Weimer"
>
>> * Jason Iannone:
>
>>> Are urpf and bcp38 interchangeable terms in this discussion? It seems
>>> impractical and operationally risky to implement two unique ways to dos
>>> customers. What are
On 09/26/2016 08:47 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
>> If you have links from both ISP A and ISP B and decide to send traffic
>> out ISP A's link sourced from addresses ISP B allocated to you, ISP A
>> *should* drop that traffic on the floor. There is no automated or
>> scalable way for ISP A to
I'm also seeing IPv6 on Rogers 4g/LTE on an Android in Winnipeg!
Looks like I'm part of 2605:8d80:400::/38
Theodore Baschak - AS395089 - Hextet Systems
https://ciscodude.net/ - https://hextet.systems/
http://mbix.ca/
> On Oct 1, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
>
> So
10 matches
Mail list logo