>> Given how slowly IPv6 is deploying, this choice may prove to have been
>> shortsighted.
>
> I doubt it. As you said, there is A LOT of crap out there that would have to
> be updated. Pulling a number out of the air, I'd guess *most* in-use devices
> would NEVER see such an update. Even from
While risking being slightly off topic: Does anyone use anycast dhcp servers?
Have you run into any problems considering synching the leases?
> Because clients will switch to unicast for renewal. Also clients will stay
> with the current server forever, so you might have a bad distribution of
> load between the servers. If one server was down everyone will switch to
> the other and never go back until forced.
Why wouldn't they go back
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 11:29 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
>
>> On 6/18/2015 16:25, Jonas Björk wrote:
>>
>>> Because clients will switch to unicast for renewal. Also clients will stay
>>> with the current server forever, so you might have a bad distribution of
4 matches
Mail list logo
